Paper · 2010 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Chemical and Sensory Comparison of Tomatoes Pollinated by Bees and by a Pollination Wand

Katja Hogendoorn; Faerlie Bartholomaeus; Michael A. Keller

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses require assisted pollination. Compared with pollination using a vibration wand, pollination by buzz pollinating bees results in improved seed set and consequently, higher fruit weight. We investigated whether there are further chemical and sensory differences between bee- and wand-pollinated cherry tomatoes, Solanum lycopersicum variety Conchita. The pollination method did not result in significant differences in concentration of soluble solids and titratable acidity. However, the concentration of soluble solids was significantly positively correlated with seed number. We suggest that an increase in the amount of soluble solids in the locular area, due to increased seed numbers, is counteracted by the effects of seed numbers on the growth of the walls, which occurs through cell elongation. In the sensory part of this study, a large, untrained panel significantly preferred bee-pollinated over wand-pollinated tomatoes and classified bee-pollinated tomatoes as having more depth of flavor than wand-pollinated tomatoes. Thus, bee-pollinated tomatoes taste better than wand-pollinated tomatoes, and it is likely that the sensory differences between the two groups of tomatoes are mediated through effects of pollination treatment on seed numbers. Future chemical and sensory studies of fresh tomatoes should take into account the effects of seed numbers and their possible effect on the distribution of chemical compounds within tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee pollination of Solanum lycopersicum improved seed set compared with vibration-wand pollination in greenhouses.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Material
Conchitae1
Treatment
pollination by buzz pollinating beese2
Outcome
seed sete2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
pollination using a vibration wande2
Setting
greenhousese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Solanum lycopersicum variety Conchita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with pollination using a vibration wand, pollination by buzz pollinating bees results in improved seed set and consequently, higher fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee pollination of Solanum lycopersicum resulted in higher fruit weight compared with vibration-wand pollination in greenhouses.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Material
Conchitae1
Treatment
pollination by buzz pollinating beese2
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
pollination using a vibration wande2
Setting
greenhousese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Solanum lycopersicum variety Conchita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with pollination using a vibration wand, pollination by buzz pollinating bees results in improved seed set and consequently, higher fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollination method did not change soluble solids concentration or titratable acidity of cherry tomatoes.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
pollination methode3
Outcome
concentration of soluble solids and titratable aciditye3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
wand-pollinated cherry tomatoese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The pollination method did not result in significant differences in concentration of soluble solids and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–527 · show in text ↑
e4

“bee- and wand-pollinated cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids concentration of tomato was significantly positively correlated with seed number.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
seed numbere5
Outcome
concentration of soluble solidse5
Direction
significantly positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“the concentration of soluble solids was significantly positively correlated with seed number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An untrained sensory panel significantly preferred bee-pollinated over wand-pollinated tomatoes.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
bee-pollinatede6
Outcome
preferrede6
Direction
significantly preferrede6
Comparator
wand-pollinated tomatoese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“a large, untrained panel significantly preferred bee-pollinated over wand-pollinated tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee-pollinated tomatoes were classified as having more depth of flavor than wand-pollinated tomatoes.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
bee-pollinatede7
Outcome
depth of flavore7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
wand-pollinated tomatoese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato flowers (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e7

“classified bee-pollinated tomatoes as having more depth of flavor than wand-pollinated tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1085 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Future chemical and sensory studies of fresh tomatoes should take into account the effects of seed numbers.

Outcome
effects of seed numberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Future chemical and sensory studies of fresh tomatoes should take into account the effects of seed numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1419 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

pollination · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pollination · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

pollination · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.