Paper · 2012 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Oscillating Pollination on Fruit Setting,Production and Quality of Tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum) in Spring

Jun Li

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to discuss the effects of oscillating pollination on fruit setting,production and quality of tomato in spring,and find out a new no hormone pollination method for tomato.[Method] The rate of fruit setting,speed of fruit setting,speed of fruit enlargement,production and quality of tomato treated by oscillating pollination,applying Fanqieling and natural pollination were comparatively analyzed in spring.[Result] The results showed that oscillating pollination could improve setting rate and growth of fruit.The fruit setting rate was the highest in three treatments on first truss fruit after applying Fanqieling,while it was the highest on second and third truss after oscillating pollination.The bunch uniformity,fruit enlargement speed,early-stage yield were higher with applying Fanqieling than those with oscillating pollination.The content of solution sugar was significant lower with oscillating pollination than that with natural pollination,while the content of lycopene was significant higher.[Conclusion] Oscillating pollination can replace Fanqieling to promote tomato fruit setting,and realize no hormone tomato production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oscillating pollination improved fruit setting rate.

Treatment
oscillating pollinatione0
Outcome
setting ratee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oscillating pollination could improve setting rate and growth of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oscillating pollination improved fruit growth.

Treatment
oscillating pollinatione0
Outcome
growth of fruite0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oscillating pollination could improve setting rate and growth of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fanqieling gave the highest first-truss fruit set.

Organ / stage
first truss fruite0
Treatment
applying Fanqielinge0
Outcome
fruit setting ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit setting rate was the highest in three treatments on first truss fruit after applying Fanqieling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oscillating pollination gave the highest second- and third-truss fruit set.

Organ / stage
second and third trusse0
Treatment
oscillating pollinatione0
Outcome
fruit settingt0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was the highest on second and third truss after oscillating pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit Setting,Production and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fanqieling increased bunch uniformity versus oscillating pollination.

Treatment
applying Fanqielinge0
Outcome
bunch uniformitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
oscillating pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bunch uniformity,fruit enlargement speed,early-stage yield were higher with applying Fanqieling than those with oscillating pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fanqieling increased fruit enlargement speed versus oscillating pollination.

Treatment
applying Fanqielinge0
Outcome
fruit enlargement speede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
oscillating pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bunch uniformity,fruit enlargement speed,early-stage yield were higher with applying Fanqieling than those with oscillating pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fanqieling increased early-stage yield versus oscillating pollination.

Treatment
applying Fanqielinge0
Outcome
early-stage yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
oscillating pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bunch uniformity,fruit enlargement speed,early-stage yield were higher with applying Fanqieling than those with oscillating pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oscillating pollination lowered soluble sugar versus natural pollination.

Treatment
oscillating pollinatione0
Outcome
content of solution sugare0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
natural pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of solution sugar was significant lower with oscillating pollination than that with natural pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oscillating pollination raised lycopene content versus natural pollination.

Treatment
oscillating pollinatione0
Outcome
content of lycopenee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
natural pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of solution sugar was significant lower with oscillating pollination than that with natural pollination,while the content of lycopene was significant higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑

pollination · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pollination · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.