Paper · 2011 · Journal of Biopesticides

MANAGEMENT OF TOMATO BACTERIAL SPOT CAUSED BY XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS USING VERMICOMPOST

Shobha Ananda Reddy; D J Bagyaraj; Radha D Kale

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The in vitro efficacy of different aqueous extracts of vermicompost prepared from leaves of Azardirachta indica, Lantana camera, Parthenium hysterophorous were tested for the management of the pathogen. Vermicompost was prepared by mixing the respective substrates with cow dung slurry (9:1 ratio w/w) independently. Among the three aqueous extracts, vermicomposted neem was found to be superior to that of vermicomposted Lantana and Parthenium in suppression of growth of X.campestris. Based on the results of the in vitro studies field studies were taken up as a combination of seed treatment with vermicompost extract and soil application of vermicompost. The seeds of tomato were soaked for one hrs in different aqueous extracts of vermicomposts before sowing. The seedlings were raised in separate nursery beds of size 1m x 1m to which vermicompost was applied at the rate of 5 tons ha-1. From the nursery beds seedlings were transplanted to plots and each plant received 250g of vermicompost (spot application) in two split doses. Since the aqueous extract of vermicomposted neem showed better suppression of the pathogen in in vitro studies, the same vermicompost was used for soil application. The results showed that the best treatment for suppression of bacterial spot in tomato was seed treatment (1 h) with 10% aqueous extract of vermicomposted neem coupled with application of vermicomposted neem to the soil both during sowing as well as on transplantation. This treatment reduced the incidence of bacterial spot by 98% and resulted in maximum yield of 15.4 t ha-1. Bioagent like aqueous extract of vermicomposted neem along with the soil amendment with the same vermicompost is essential for the management of the pathogen in affected soils. Use of such alternate materials which are non-polluting, cost effective, non hazardous and do not disturb ecological balance can reduce the use of copper based bactericides, leading to elimination of copper entry into the soil system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicomposted neem suppressed X.campestris growth more than vermicomposted Lantana and Parthenium.

Treatment
vermicomposted neeme0
Interactor
X.campestrise0pathogen
Outcome
growth of X.campestrise0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
vermicomposted Lantana and Partheniume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicomposted neem was found to be superior to that of vermicomposted Lantana and Parthenium in suppression of growth of X.campestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 10% vermicomposted neem extract plus soil application at sowing and transplanting was the best bacterial spot treatment in tomato.

Treatment
seed treatment (1 h) with 10% aqueous extract of vermicomposted neem coupled with application of vermicomposted neem to the soil both during sowing as well as on transplantatione0
Interactor
bacterial spote0pathogen
Outcome
suppression of bacterial spot in tomatoe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the best treatment for suppression of bacterial spot in tomato was seed treatment (1 h) with 10% aqueous extract of vermicomposted neem coupled with application of vermicomposted neem to the soil both during sowing as well as on transplantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The neem treatment reduced bacterial spot incidence by 98%.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Interactor
bacterial spote0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of bacterial spote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment reduced the incidence of bacterial spot by 98% and resulted in maximum yield of 15.4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The neem treatment gave maximum tomato yield of 15.4 t ha-1.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.4 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment reduced the incidence of bacterial spot by 98% and resulted in maximum yield of 15.4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

botanical · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

seed treatment · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.