Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluation of IDM Components for Management of Tomato Powdery Mildew under Protected Cultivation

Aru shi; A.B. Malannavar; D.K. Banyal

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Powdery mildew caused by Oidium neolycopersici L. Kiss is one of the most important diseases of tomato under polyhouse conditions. During 2014-15, polyhouses of Kangra district (H.P., India) were surveyed and the disease severity was observed between 5.0 to 89.5 per cent affecting both quality and quantity of the harvest. Fourteen hybrids/cultivars of tomato were screened under p house conditions during 2014-15 cropping season, but all were found either susceptible or weakly resistant against powdery mildew. In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control. Among these, both strains of T. harzianum (TH-1 and TH-2) were found highly effective in controlling the disease. In vivo evaluation of three botanicals viz., Eupatorium adenophorum, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica showed that aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control being maximum i.e. 65.1 per cent was provided by E. adenophorum. Three sprays of eight fungicides at 10 days interval were evaluated and hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/l and difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/l were found highly effective with 91.0 and 89.2 per cent disease control and 42.0 and 39.0 per cent increase in yield as compared to check, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato powdery mildew severity ranged from 5.0 to 89.5 per cent in surveyed polyhouses and affected harvest quality and quantity.

Interactor
Oidium neolycopersiciErysiphe neolycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
5.0 to 89.5 per cente0
Qualifier
affecting both quality and quantity of the harveste0
Setting
Kangra district (H.P., India)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 2014-15, polyhouses of Kangra district (H.P., India) were surveyed and the disease severity was observed between 5.0 to 89.5 per cent affecting both quality and quantity of the harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–323 · show in text ↑
e1

“Powdery mildew caused by Oidium neolycopersici L. Kiss is one of the most important diseases of tomato under polyhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fourteen screened tomato hybrids or cultivars were susceptible or weakly resistant to powdery mildew.

Outcome
susceptible or weakly resistant against powdery mildewe0
Value
Fourteene0
Setting
p house conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen hybrids/cultivars of tomato were screened under p house conditions during 2014-15 cropping season, but all were found either susceptible or weakly resistant against powdery mildew.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum-1 at 10 g/l was among bioagents providing 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.

Treatment
Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianum-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
63.9-75.41 per cente0
Qualifier
@ 10 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum-2 at 10 g/l was among bioagents providing 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.

Treatment
T. harzianum-2 (TH-2)e0
Interactor
T. harzianum-2e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
63.9-75.41 per cente0
Qualifier
@ 10 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride-1 at 10 g/l was among bioagents providing 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.

Treatment
T. viride-1 (TV-1)e0
Interactor
T. viride-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
63.9-75.41 per cente0
Qualifier
@ 10 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride-2 at 10 g/l was among bioagents providing 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.

Treatment
T. viride-2 (TV-2)e0
Interactor
T. viride-2e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
63.9-75.41 per cente0
Qualifier
@ 10 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 at 10 g/l was among bioagents providing 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescence-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
63.9-75.41 per cente0
Qualifier
@ 10 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of bioagents viz., Trichoderma harzianum-1 (TH-1), T. harzianum-2 (TH-2), T. viride-1 (TV-1), T. viride-2 (TV-2) and Pseudomonas fluorescence-1 (PF-1) @ 10 g/l showed 63.9-75.41 per cent disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum TH-1 was highly effective in disease control.

Treatment
TH-1e0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controlling the diseasee0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among these, both strains of T. harzianum (TH-1 and TH-2) were found highly effective in controlling the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum TH-2 was highly effective in disease control.

Treatment
TH-2e0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controlling the diseasee0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among these, both strains of T. harzianum (TH-1 and TH-2) were found highly effective in controlling the disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. adenophorum extract provided the maximum disease control, 65.1 per cent, at 100 per cent concentration.

Treatment
E. adenophorume0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.1 per cente0
Qualifier
aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of three botanicals viz., Eupatorium adenophorum, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica showed that aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control being maximum i.e. 65.1 per cent was provided by E. adenophorum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melia azedarach aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control.

Treatment
Melia azedarache0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
more than 50 per cente0
Qualifier
aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of three botanicals viz., Eupatorium adenophorum, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica showed that aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control.

Treatment
Azadirachta indicae0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
more than 50 per cente0
Qualifier
aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo evaluation of three botanicals viz., Eupatorium adenophorum, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica showed that aqueous extract at 100 per cent concentration provided more than 50 per cent disease control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaconazole 5EC at 1 ml/l provided 91.0 per cent disease control after three sprays at 10-day intervals.

Treatment
hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/le0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
91.0e0
Qualifier
Three sprays of eight fungicides at 10 days intervale0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of eight fungicides at 10 days interval were evaluated and hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/l and difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/l were found highly effective with 91.0 and 89.2 per cent disease control and 42.0 and 39.0 per cent increase in yield as compared to check, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole 25EC at 0.05 ml/l provided 89.2 per cent disease control after three sprays at 10-day intervals.

Treatment
difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/le0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
89.2 per cente0
Qualifier
Three sprays of eight fungicides at 10 days intervale0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three sprays of eight fungicides at 10 days interval were evaluated and hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/l and difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/l were found highly effective with 91.0 and 89.2 per cent disease control and 42.0 and 39.0 per cent increase in yield as compared to check, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaconazole 5EC at 1 ml/l increased yield by 42.0 per cent versus check.

Treatment
hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
42.0e0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/l and difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/l were found highly effective with 91.0 and 89.2 per cent disease control and 42.0 and 39.0 per cent increase in yield as compared to check, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole 25EC at 0.05 ml/l increased yield by 39.0 per cent versus check.

Treatment
difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39.0 per cente0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hexaconazole 5EC @ 1 ml/l and difenoconazole 25EC @ 0.05 ml/l were found highly effective with 91.0 and 89.2 per cent disease control and 42.0 and 39.0 per cent increase in yield as compared to check, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hexaconazole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.