Abstract
The evaluation of integrated pest management technologies against fall armyworm in maize was conducted by District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre (DAATTC), Vizianagaram in five farmer’s field during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22. The results revealed that the pest incidence was lower in IPM module compared to the historically adopted farmer’s practices, featuring here as a control. The increase in yield of 6.78% was observed in IPM demonstration (8503 kg/ha) compared to the control (7963 kg/ha). The net returns of Rs. 10,3214.00/ha and Rs. 91,145.00/ha were obtained in the IPM and control, respectively. The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 747 kg/ha, 540 kg/ha and 8.07%, respectively. The lower technology index indicates that the technology implementation is feasible providing better education and popularization of the new programs thus reducing the gap between extension programs and new technologies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced fall armyworm incidence compared with farmer practice.
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- fall armyworm
.jpg?width=60)
Spodoptera frugiperdat1peste0 - Outcome
- pest incidencee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- historically adopted farmer’s practicese0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the pest incidence was lower in IPM module compared to the historically adopted farmer’s practices, featuring here as a control”
t0“maize”
t1“fall armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM increased maize yield by 6.78% relative to control.
- Treatment
- IPM demonstratione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.78%e0
- Qualifier
- 8503 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in yield of 6.78% was observed in IPM demonstration (8503 kg/ha) compared to the control (7963 kg/ha)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM had net returns of Rs. 10,3214.00/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net returns of Rs. 10,3214.00/ha and Rs. 91,145.00/ha were obtained in the IPM and control, respectively”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The extension gap was 747 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 747 kg/ha, 540 kg/ha and 8.07%, respectively”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology gap was 540 kg/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 747 kg/ha, 540 kg/ha and 8.07%, respectively”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology index was 8.07%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 747 kg/ha, 540 kg/ha and 8.07%, respectively”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →ipm · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.