Paper · 2024 · Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences

Comparison of toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against thrips (Thrips tabaci) on cotton crop under different irrigation regimes

Qurban Ali; Humair Amin; Bushra Akhtar

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is the main cash crop and back bone of agriculture. However, its yield is decreasing due to insect pests attack. Among them, sucking insect pests are serious problem in cotton and various agricultural crops. Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop. The research trial was executed with varied planting geometry under different irrigation regimes. Sowing of the cotton crop was done with plant to plant distance of 30 and 60 cm while row to row distance was 4 ft. apart. The plants were irrigated under single lateral and double lateral arrangements of drip irrigation while control plot was irrigated through conventional surface irrigation method. Results of relative incidence of thrips population on different irrigation plots showed that highest thrips population (19.43/plant) was noted in case of flood irrigated plot having plant to plant distance of 30 cm followed by in double lateral drip irrigation plot (15/plant) and single lateral plot (13.10 thrips/plant). Comparatively lower mean thrips population values; 16.30, 12.40 and 10.56 thrips/plant, respectively were recorded in experimental plot under 60 cm plant to plant distance. Toxicity bioassays revealed that highest reduction (75.27%) was recorded in spinetoram while lowest thrips population reduction (28.18%) was recorded in case of spinosad. It can be concluded that spinetoram can be effective tool for efficient control of thrips leading to augmentation in cotton crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips population was highest in the flood irrigated plot with 30 cm plant spacing, at 19.43 thrips per plant.

Treatment
flood irrigatede0
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
thrips populatione0
Value
19.43/plante0
Qualifier
plant to plant distance of 30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest thrips population (19.43/plant) was noted in case of flood irrigated plot having plant to plant distance of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram gave the highest reduction of thrips population, 75.27%, compared with spinosad.

Treatment
spinetorame2
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
thrips population reductione2
Direction
higheste2
Value
75.27%e2
Comparator
spinosade2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e2

“Toxicity bioassays revealed that highest reduction (75.27%) was recorded in spinetoram while lowest thrips population reduction (28.18%) was recorded in case of spinosad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the lowest reduction of thrips population, 28.18%, compared with spinetoram.

Treatment
spinosade2
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
thrips population reductione2
Direction
loweste2
Value
28.18%e2
Comparator
spinetorame2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e2

“Toxicity bioassays revealed that highest reduction (75.27%) was recorded in spinetoram while lowest thrips population reduction (28.18%) was recorded in case of spinosad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1414 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean thrips population was lower at 60 cm plant spacing, with a value of 16.30 thrips per plant.

Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
mean thrips population valuese3
Value
16.30e3
Qualifier
under 60 cm plant to plant distancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Comparatively lower mean thrips population values; 16.30, 12.40 and 10.56 thrips/plant, respectively were recorded in experimental plot under 60 cm plant to plant distance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean thrips population was lower at 60 cm plant spacing, with a value of 12.40 thrips per plant.

Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
mean thrips population valuese3
Value
12.40e3
Qualifier
under 60 cm plant to plant distancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Comparatively lower mean thrips population values; 16.30, 12.40 and 10.56 thrips/plant, respectively were recorded in experimental plot under 60 cm plant to plant distance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean thrips population was lower at 60 cm plant spacing, with a value of 10.56 thrips per plant.

Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
mean thrips population valuese3
Value
10.56e3
Qualifier
under 60 cm plant to plant distancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Comparatively lower mean thrips population values; 16.30, 12.40 and 10.56 thrips/plant, respectively were recorded in experimental plot under 60 cm plant to plant distance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips population was 15 per plant under double lateral drip irrigation.

Treatment
double lateral drip irrigatione5
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
thrips populatione0
Value
15/plante5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest thrips population (19.43/plant) was noted in case of flood irrigated plot having plant to plant distance of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–963 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by in double lateral drip irrigation plot (15/plant) and single lateral plot (13.10 thrips/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips population was 13.10 per plant under single lateral drip irrigation.

Treatment
single laterale5
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
thrips populatione0
Value
13.10 thrips/plante5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest thrips population (19.43/plant) was noted in case of flood irrigated plot having plant to plant distance of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–963 · show in text ↑
e5

“followed by in double lateral drip irrigation plot (15/plant) and single lateral plot (13.10 thrips/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram can be an effective tool for efficient control of thrips in cotton.

Treatment
spinetorame4
Outcome
efficient control of thripse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hence, present research work was executed to assess the toxicity of some synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci in cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–347 · show in text ↑
e4

“It can be concluded that spinetoram can be effective tool for efficient control of thrips leading to augmentation in cotton crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1550 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

spinosad · Thrips tabaci · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Spinetoram · Thrips tabaci · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.