Paper · 2023 · Progressive Horticulture

Effect of different coloured shade net and organic foliar sprays on growth and yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) under low tunnel structure

Bhavani; G. Ramesh; Ashok Hugar; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An investigation was carried out on the “Effect of coloured shade net and organic foliar sprays on the growth and yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) under low tunnel structure” at College of Agricultural Engineering, UAS, Raichur (Karnataka). The experiment consisted of three main treatment (S1-white coloured shade net, S2- green coloured shade net, S3- open condition) and five sub treatment (F1- Humic acid @ 3 g l-1, F2- Panchagavya @ 3%, F3-seaweed extract @ 2 ml l-1, F4- Vermiwash @ 10 ml l-1, F5- water) with three replications. The treatment white coloured shade net along with foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2 ml l-1 showed significantly higher plant height (57.74 cm), number of leaves per plant (34.33), leaf area (11625.20 cm2), leaf area index (5.74), chlorophyll content (67.69), dry matter content (176.57 g plant-1) and yield per hectare (23.93 t). The treatment combination of open condition with water spray resulted in lowest in growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White shade net with seaweed spray gave significantly higher plant height of 57.74 cm.

Treatment
white coloured shade net along with foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2 ml l-1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.74 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment white coloured shade net along with foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2 ml l-1 showed significantly higher plant height (57.74 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave significantly higher leaf number of 34.33 per plant.

Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.33e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed significantly higher plant height (57.74 cm), number of leaves per plant (34.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave significantly higher leaf area of 11625.20 cm2.

Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
11625.20 cm2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed significantly higher plant height (57.74 cm), number of leaves per plant (34.33), leaf area (11625.20 cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave a significantly higher leaf area index of 5.74.

Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
5.74e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area index (5.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave significantly higher chlorophyll content of 67.69.

Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
67.69e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content (67.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave significantly higher dry matter content of 176.57 g plant-1.

Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
176.57 g plant-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter content (176.57 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave significantly higher yield of 23.93 t per hectare.

Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
23.93 te0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield per hectare (23.93 t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open conditions with water spray gave the lowest growth and yield.

Treatment
open condition with water spraye0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of open condition with water spray resulted in lowest in growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

shade · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

protected cultivation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 74 positive, 5 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 104 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

other · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.