Paper · 2005 · Journal of Zhejiang University Agriculture and Life Sciences

Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower

Cao Jia-shu

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present experiment,early cauliflower cultivar 'Feng-xi 45-day' was employed to study the effect of shading to curd growth and antioxidant system of the plant.Cauliflower plants were covered with screening net for 14 days when the curd was initiated.During the shading treatment,light intensity was reduced to 30 percent.The main results were as follows.(i) Under shading condition,curd height,curd diameter,and curd weight were reduced by 17.97,18.90 and 38.59 percent,respectively,as compared with the control.(ii) The activities of SOD,CAT,APX,and G-POD in cauliflower leaves,curds and fleshy rachises decreased under shading condition,except for G-POD activity in leaves,which increased significantly,as compared with the control.(iii) The activities of DHAR and GR decreased significantly in the shaded plants.(iv) AsA and DAsA content of cauliflower leaves, curds and fleshy rachises decreased under shading condition,except for AsA content of curds.GSH and GSSG content of leaves decreased under shading condition, but GSH and GSSG content of curds and fleshy rachises increased significantly,except for GSH of fleshy rachises.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced cauliflower curd height by 17.97 percent versus the control.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
curd heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.97e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under shading condition,curd height,curd diameter,and curd weight were reduced by 17.97,18.90 and 38.59 percent,respectively,as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced cauliflower curd diameter by 18.90 percent versus the control.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
curd diametere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.90e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under shading condition,curd height,curd diameter,and curd weight were reduced by 17.97,18.90 and 38.59 percent,respectively,as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced cauliflower curd weight by 38.59 percent versus the control.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
curd weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.59e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under shading condition,curd height,curd diameter,and curd weight were reduced by 17.97,18.90 and 38.59 percent,respectively,as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased SOD, CAT and APX activities in cauliflower leaves, curds and fleshy rachises.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
activities of SOD,CAT,APXe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of SOD,CAT,APX,and G-POD in cauliflower leaves,curds and fleshy rachises decreased under shading condition,except for G-POD activity in leaves,which increased significantly,as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased G-POD activity in cauliflower leaves.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
G-POD activity in leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of SOD,CAT,APX,and G-POD in cauliflower leaves,curds and fleshy rachises decreased under shading condition,except for G-POD activity in leaves,which increased significantly,as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DHAR and GR activities decreased significantly in shaded cauliflower.

Treatment
shadede0
Outcome
activities of DHAR and GRe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of DHAR and GR decreased significantly in the shaded plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased AsA and DAsA content of cauliflower organs, except curd AsA.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
AsA and DAsA contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except for AsA content of curdse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AsA and DAsA content of cauliflower leaves, curds and fleshy rachises decreased under shading condition,except for AsA content of curds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased leaf GSH and GSSG content.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
GSH and GSSG content of leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH and GSSG content of leaves decreased under shading condition, but GSH and GSSG content of curds and fleshy rachises increased significantly,except for GSH of fleshy rachises.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased curd and fleshy rachis GSSG and curd GSH content, except fleshy rachis GSH.

Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
GSH and GSSG content of curds and fleshy rachisese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH and GSSG content of leaves decreased under shading condition, but GSH and GSSG content of curds and fleshy rachises increased significantly,except for GSH of fleshy rachises.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.