Paper · 1993 · HortScience

A SEASON EXTENSION TECHNIQUE FOR COOL SEASON VEGETABLES USING POLY TUNNELS AND ROW COVERS

Gloria McIntosh; Gerald Klingaman

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Spunbonded polyester or polystyrene row covers were used as additional cold protection for spinach (Spinacia oleracea), kale (Brassica oleracea), pak choi (Brassica rapa) and P-types of lettuce (Lactuca savita) grown in ground beds under unheated polyethylene tunnels during the fall and winter of 1991 and 1992 in climatic zone 6. Temperatures inside poly tunnels averaged 2.4C warmer than outside. Average temperatures were 1.9C warmer than control under polystyrene and 1.5C warmer under spunbonded polyester. Average hourly temperatures showed both row covers offered significantly more cold protection than the greenhouse covering alone; but the two row covers offered similar protection from the cold. Row covers did not result in fresh weight differences in most of the species tested, except kale which had greater fresh weight in control. It may be concluded that during a similar mild winter, these cool season vegetables could be grown under unheated polyethylene tunnels with no additional protection necessary. When temperatures are lower, row covers could provide the protection required to produce these crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row covers generally did not change fresh weight of spinach (Spinacia oleracea).

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea)Spinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
Row coverse0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not result in fresh weight differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row covers did not result in fresh weight differences in most of the species tested, except kale which had greater fresh weight in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea), kale (Brassica oleracea), pak choi (Brassica rapa) and P-types of lettuce (Lactuca savita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row covers generally did not change fresh weight of pak choi.

Taxon
pak choi (Brassica rapa)Brassica rapae1
Treatment
Row coverse0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not result in fresh weight differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row covers did not result in fresh weight differences in most of the species tested, except kale which had greater fresh weight in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“pak choi (Brassica rapa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kale had greater fresh weight in the control.

Treatment
Row coverse0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row covers did not result in fresh weight differences in most of the species tested, except kale which had greater fresh weight in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–847 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude extra protection is unnecessary under similarly mild winters.

Taxon
cool season vegetablese0
Outcome
grown under unheated polyethylene tunnels with no additional protection necessarye0

Verbatim

e0

“during a similar mild winter, these cool season vegetables could be grown under unheated polyethylene tunnels with no additional protection necessary.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1023 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest row covers for colder production conditions.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
row covers could provide the protection required to produce these cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“When temperatures are lower, row covers could provide the protection required to produce these crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1125 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.