Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Environmental Science

Nighttime warming promotes copper translocation from root to shoot of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through enlarging root systems

Lin Qi; Chunxia Li; Lukuan Lai; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether and how nighttime warming (NW) influences the copper (Cu) bioaccumulation of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under Cu pollution. We examined plant growth, Cu concentration, and antioxidant enzymes of wheat after 6 months of Cu exposure (0, 100, 400, and 800 mg/kg) under NW. The results indicated that, NW of 1.54°C significantly promoted Cu translocation from root to shoot through an increasing root system under increased Cu treatments ( p < 0.05). The Cu contents of grains were significantly increased by NW under 800 mg/kg Cu treatment ( p < 0.05). NW decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity under increased Cu treatments ( p < 0.05). There were significantly negative correlations between biomass and Cu concentrations of the same part under NW ( p < 0.05). The root biomass significantly increased by 51% in NW compared with nonnighttime warming (CK) ( p < 0.05). These results provided evidence that wheat might respond to NW by altering their roots so that they were larger, thinner, and longer, suggesting that soil Cu translocation from root to shoot would be accelerated resulting from the expanded roots under elevated temperatures, and thus forewarned the food safety risks of climate change in agricultural ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming promoted copper translocation from wheat root to shoot under increased copper treatments.

Treatment
NW of 1.54°Ce0
Outcome
Cu translocation from root to shoote0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
under increased Cu treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NW of 1.54°C significantly promoted Cu translocation from root to shoot through an increasing root system under increased Cu treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased grain copper content under 800 mg/kg copper treatment.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
NWe0
Outcome
Cu contents of grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
800 mg/kg Cu treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cu contents of grains were significantly increased by NW under 800 mg/kg Cu treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased superoxide dismutase activity under increased copper treatments.

Treatment
NWe0
Gene
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
increased Cu treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NW decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity under increased Cu treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass was negatively correlated with copper concentration in the same wheat part under nighttime warming.

Treatment
NWe0
Compound
Cue0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
same parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly negative correlations between biomass and Cu concentrations of the same part under NW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root biomass by 51% compared with no nighttime warming.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
NWe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
51%e0
Comparator
nonnighttime warming (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root biomass significantly increased by 51% in NW compared with nonnighttime warming (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that nighttime warming produces larger, thinner and longer wheat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
NWe0
Outcome
roots so that they were larger, thinner, and longere0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat might respond to NW by altering their roots so that they were larger, thinner, and longer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1048 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest expanded roots under elevated temperatures accelerate soil copper translocation to shoots.

Organ / stage
expanded rootse0
Outcome
soil Cu translocation from root to shoote0
Qualifier
elevated temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil Cu translocation from root to shoot would be accelerated resulting from the expanded roots under elevated temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑

heat · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.