Paper · 2024 · Foods

The Impact of a Six-Hour Light–Dark Cycle on Wheat Ear Emergence, Grain Yield, and Flour Quality in Future Plant-Growing Systems

Helena Clauw; Hans Van de Put; Abderahman Sghaier; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

) in a closed environment offers applications in both indoor farming and in outer-space farming. Tailoring the photoperiod holds potential to shorten the growth cycle, thereby increasing the annual number of cycles. As wheat is a long-day plant, a night shorter than a critical length is required to induce flowering. In growth chambers, experiments were conducted to examine the impact of a 6 h light-dark cycle on the timing of wheat ear emergence, grain yield, and flour quality. Under equal daily light-integral conditions, the 6 h light-dark cycle promoted growth and development, resulting in accelerated ear emergence when compared to a 12 h cycle, additionally indicating that 12 h of darkness was excessive. To further stimulate heading and increase yield, the 6 h cycle was changed at the onset of stem elongation to a 14 h-10 h, mimicking spring conditions, and maintained until maturity. This successful transition was then combined with two levels of light intensity and nutrient solution, which did not significantly impact yield, while tillering and grain ripening did increase under higher light intensities. Moreover, it enabled manipulation of the baking quality, although lower-end falling numbers were observed. In conclusion, combining a 6 h light-dark cycle until stem elongation with a 14 h-10 h cycle presents a promising strategy for increasing future wheat production in closed environments. The observation of low falling numbers underscores the importance of factoring in flour quality when designing the wheat-growing systems of the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 6 h light-dark cycle accelerated wheat ear emergence compared with a 12 h cycle under equal daily light integral.

Treatment
6 h light-dark cyclee0
Outcome
ear emergencee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
12 h cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under equal daily light-integral conditions, the 6 h light-dark cycle promoted growth and development, resulting in accelerated ear emergence when compared to a 12 h cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher light intensity and nutrient solution levels did not significantly change wheat yield.

Treatment
two levels of light intensity and nutrient solutione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined with two levels of light intensity and nutrient solution, which did not significantly impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher light intensity increased wheat tillering and grain ripening.

Treatment
higher light intensitiese0
Outcome
tillering and grain ripeninge0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillering and grain ripening did increase under higher light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lighting transition enabled manipulation of wheat baking quality.

Treatment
6 h cyclee0
Outcome
baking qualitye0
Direction
manipulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To further stimulate heading and increase yield, the 6 h cycle was changed at the onset of stem elongation to a 14 h-10 h, mimicking spring conditions, and maintained until maturity. This successful transition was then combined with two levels of light intensity and nutrient solution, which did not significantly impact yield, while tillering and grain ripening did increase under higher light intensities. Moreover, it enabled manipulation of the baking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-end falling numbers were observed in wheat flour.

Outcome
falling numberse0
Direction
lower-ende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower-end falling numbers were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1230 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–449 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose a 6 h light-dark cycle until stem elongation followed by a 14 h-10 h cycle to increase wheat production in closed environments.

Outcome
combining a 6 h light-dark cycle until stem elongation with a 14 h-10 h cyclee0
Setting
closed environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining a 6 h light-dark cycle until stem elongation with a 14 h-10 h cycle presents a promising strategy for increasing future wheat production in closed environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1416 · show in text ↑

light · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.