Paper · 2005 · Functional Plant Biology

Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret and grain number determination similar to that of radiation?

Fernanda G. González; Gustavo A. Slafer; Daniel J. Miralles

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
94
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increasing duration of stem elongation by exposure to short photoperiod would result in higher spike dry weight at anthesis, which is positively associated with the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat. However, it is not easy to determine whether photoperiod effects on fertile florets and grains are only mediated by assimilate supply to the growing spike when spike weight variation is attained only with photoperiod treatments. The aim of this study was to determine whether photoperiod effects on number of fertile florets and grains may be direct, that is, not mediated by assimilate supply, by comparing the magnitude of photoperiod effects with those of shading the canopy. Spike dry weight at anthesis was changed through the factorial combination of different photoperiod (natural and 6 h extended photoperiod) and shading (un-shaded and 67 ± 3% shaded) treatments during stem elongation of Buck Manantial, a cultivar known for its photoperiod sensitivity in this phase. Both treatments modified spike dry weight at anthesis and the number of fertile florets and grains, independently. When duration of stem elongation was lengthened by exposure to natural photoperiod and when incident radiation was high, spike dry weight at anthesis increased by 33% (NP+0 v. NP+6) and 27% (un-shaded v. shaded), respectively. The number of fertile florets increased similarly to spike dry weight (34% NP+0 v. NP+6 and 28% un-shaded v. shaded) resulting in higher number of grains. Most photoperiod effects on the number of fertile florets and, consequently, on the number of grains, were mediated by assimilate supply to the growing spike as the same relationship between the number of fertile florets and spike dry weight at anthesis was observed for photoperiod and shading treatments (R2 = 0.99, P<0.05).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural photoperiod (NP+0) increased spike dry weight at anthesis by 33% compared with NP+6.

Material
Buck Manantiale2
Organ / stage
spikee3
Treatment
natural photoperiode3
Outcome
spike dry weight at anthesise3
Direction
increasede3
Value
33%e3
Comparator
NP+6e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e2

“Buck Manantial, a cultivar known for its photoperiod sensitivity in this phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–988 · show in text ↑
e3

“When duration of stem elongation was lengthened by exposure to natural photoperiod and when incident radiation was high, spike dry weight at anthesis increased by 33% (NP+0 v. NP+6) and 27% (un-shaded v. shaded), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Un-shaded canopy increased spike dry weight at anthesis by 27% compared with shaded canopy.

Material
Buck Manantiale2
Organ / stage
spikee3
Treatment
un-shadede3
Outcome
spike dry weight at anthesise3
Direction
increasede3
Value
27%e3
Comparator
shadede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e2

“Buck Manantial, a cultivar known for its photoperiod sensitivity in this phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–988 · show in text ↑
e3

“When duration of stem elongation was lengthened by exposure to natural photoperiod and when incident radiation was high, spike dry weight at anthesis increased by 33% (NP+0 v. NP+6) and 27% (un-shaded v. shaded), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural photoperiod (NP+0) increased fertile floret number by 34% compared with NP+6.

Treatment
NP+0e4
Outcome
number of fertile floretse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
34%e4
Comparator
NP+6e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of fertile florets increased similarly to spike dry weight (34% NP+0 v. NP+6 and 28% un-shaded v. shaded) resulting in higher number of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Un-shaded canopy increased fertile floret number by 28% compared with shaded canopy.

Treatment
un-shadede4
Outcome
number of fertile floretse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
28%e4
Comparator
shadede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of fertile florets increased similarly to spike dry weight (34% NP+0 v. NP+6 and 28% un-shaded v. shaded) resulting in higher number of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1485 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertile floret number was closely related to spike dry weight at anthesis across photoperiod and shading treatments.

Treatment
photoperiod and shading treatmentse6
Outcome
relationship between the number of fertile florets and spike dry weight at anthesise6
Value
R2 = 0.99e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e6

“the same relationship between the number of fertile florets and spike dry weight at anthesis was observed for photoperiod and shading treatments (R2 = 0.99, P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1812 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most photoperiod effects on fertile floret and grain number were mediated by assimilate supply to the spike (author interpretation).

Outcome
photoperiod effects on the number of fertile floretse5
Qualifier
mediated by assimilate supply to the growing spikee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e5

“Most photoperiod effects on the number of fertile florets and, consequently, on the number of grains, were mediated by assimilate supply to the growing spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1644 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod and shading treatments resulted in higher grain number.

Treatment
photoperiod and shading treatmentse6
Outcome
number of grainse4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the number of fertile florets and grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–210 · show in text ↑
e4

“The number of fertile florets increased similarly to spike dry weight (34% NP+0 v. NP+6 and 28% un-shaded v. shaded) resulting in higher number of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1485 · show in text ↑
e6

“the same relationship between the number of fertile florets and spike dry weight at anthesis was observed for photoperiod and shading treatments (R2 = 0.99, P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1812 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.