Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Use of ginger extract and bacterial inoculants for the suppression of Alternaria solani causing early blight disease in Tomato

Sajjad Hyder; Amjad Shahzad Gondal; Anam Sehar; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Early blight (EB), caused by Alternaria solani, is a serious problem in tomato production. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote plant growth and inhibit plant disease. The present study explored the bio-efficacy of synergistic effect of rhizobacterial isolates and ginger powder extract (GPE) against tomato EB disease, singly and in combination. Six fungal isolates from symptomatic tomato plants were identified as A. solani on the basis of morphological features i.e., horizontal septation (6.96 to 7.93 µm), vertical septation (1.50 to 2.22 µm), conidia length (174.2 to 187.6 µm), conidial width (14.09 to 16.52 µm), beak length (93.06 to 102.26 µm), and sporulation. Five of the twenty-three bacterial isolates recovered from tomato rhizosphere soil were nonpathogenic to tomato seedlings and were compatible with each other and with GPE. Out of five isolates tested individually, three isolates (St-149D, Hyd-13Z, and Gb-T23) showed maximum inhibition (56.3%, 48.3%, and 42.0% respectively) against mycelial growth of A. solani. Among combinations, St-149D + GPE had the highest mycelial growth inhibition (76.9%) over the untreated control. Bacterial strains molecularly characterized as Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus cereus and were further tested in pot trials through seed bacterization for disease control. Seeds treated with bacterial consortia + GPE had the highest disease suppression percentage (78.1%), followed by St-149D + GPE (72.2%) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (67.5%). Maximum seed germination was obtained in the bacterial consortia + GPE (95.0 ± 2.04) followed by St-149D + GPE (92.5 ± 1.44) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (90.0 ± 2.04) over control (73.8 ± 2.39) and chemical control as standard treatment (90.0 ± 2). Ginger powder extracts also induce the activation of defence-related enzymes (TPC, PO, PPO, PAL, and CAT) activity in tomato plants. These were highly significant in the testing bacterial inoculants against A. solani infection in tomato crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six fungal isolates from symptomatic tomato plants were identified as Alternaria solani on morphological features.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Outcome
identified as A. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six fungal isolates from symptomatic tomato plants were identified as A. solani on the basis of morphological features”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolate St-149D inhibited mycelial growth of Alternaria solani by 56.3% in vitro.

Treatment
St-149De0
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
St-149De0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
56.3%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three isolates (St-149D, Hyd-13Z, and Gb-T23) showed maximum inhibition (56.3%, 48.3%, and 42.0% respectively) against mycelial growth of A. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolate Hyd-13Z inhibited mycelial growth of Alternaria solani by 48.3% in vitro.

Treatment
Hyd-13Ze0
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Hyd-13Ze0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
48.3%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three isolates (St-149D, Hyd-13Z, and Gb-T23) showed maximum inhibition (56.3%, 48.3%, and 42.0% respectively) against mycelial growth of A. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolate Gb-T23 inhibited mycelial growth of Alternaria solani by 42.0% in vitro.

Treatment
Gb-T23e0
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Gb-T23e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
42.0%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three isolates (St-149D, Hyd-13Z, and Gb-T23) showed maximum inhibition (56.3%, 48.3%, and 42.0% respectively) against mycelial growth of A. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of isolate St-149D and ginger powder extract gave the highest mycelial growth inhibition, 76.9%, relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
St-149D + GPEe0
Outcome
mycelial growth inhibitione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.9%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Among combinations, St-149D + GPE had the highest mycelial growth inhibition (76.9%) over the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot trials, seed bacterization with bacterial consortia + GPE gave a disease suppression of 78.1% against early blight in tomato.

Treatment
bacterial consortia + GPEe0
Outcome
disease suppression percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
78.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds treated with bacterial consortia + GPE had the highest disease suppression percentage (78.1%), followed by St-149D + GPE (72.2%) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (67.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot trials, seed bacterization with St-149D + GPE gave a disease suppression of 72.2% against early blight in tomato.

Treatment
St-149D + GPEe0
Outcome
disease suppression percentagee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
72.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds treated with bacterial consortia + GPE had the highest disease suppression percentage (78.1%), followed by St-149D + GPE (72.2%) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (67.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot trials, seed bacterization with Hyd-13Z + GPE gave a disease suppression of 67.5% against early blight in tomato.

Treatment
Hyd-13Z + GPEe0
Outcome
disease suppression percentagee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
67.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds treated with bacterial consortia + GPE had the highest disease suppression percentage (78.1%), followed by St-149D + GPE (72.2%) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (67.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination of tomato was 95.0 ± 2.04 with bacterial consortia + GPE compared with the control (73.8 ± 2.39).

Treatment
bacterial consortia + GPEe0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
95.0 ± 2.04e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum seed germination was obtained in the bacterial consortia + GPE (95.0 ± 2.04) followed by St-149D + GPE (92.5 ± 1.44) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (90.0 ± 2.04) over control (73.8 ± 2.39) and chemical control as standard treatment (90.0 ± 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination of tomato was 92.5 ± 1.44 with St-149D + GPE compared with the control (73.8 ± 2.39).

Treatment
St-149D + GPEe0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
92.5 ± 1.44e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum seed germination was obtained in the bacterial consortia + GPE (95.0 ± 2.04) followed by St-149D + GPE (92.5 ± 1.44) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (90.0 ± 2.04) over control (73.8 ± 2.39) and chemical control as standard treatment (90.0 ± 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination of tomato was 90.0 ± 2.04 with Hyd-13Z + GPE compared with the control (73.8 ± 2.39).

Treatment
Hyd-13Z + GPEe0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
90.0 ± 2.04e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum seed germination was obtained in the bacterial consortia + GPE (95.0 ± 2.04) followed by St-149D + GPE (92.5 ± 1.44) and Hyd-13Z + GPE (90.0 ± 2.04) over control (73.8 ± 2.39) and chemical control as standard treatment (90.0 ± 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger powder extracts induced the activity of defence-related enzymes (TPC, PO, PPO, PAL and CAT) in tomato plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Ginger powder extractse0
Outcome
defence-related enzymes (TPC, PO, PPO, PAL, and CAT) activitye0
Direction
induce the activatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ginger powder extracts also induce the activation of defence-related enzymes (TPC, PO, PPO, PAL, and CAT) activity in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1881 · show in text ↑

botanical · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 146 positive, 14 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.