Paper · 2024 · Pure and Applied Biology

Effect of herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed at seeds sprouting

Muhammad Khan

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The research was conducted at the experimental field, Southwest University of Science and Technology in three experimental phases; (1) Field trials were carried out in a Randomized Complete Blocked Design. The chemical compounds, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentrations (N: P: K; 24:8:8) were applied to the xikamai-18 cultivar. Stellaria medium grew more than ordinary chickweed with NPK treatment. (2) Glasshouse trials were carried out single fertilizer of N (blank, 0.062, 0.070, 0.78 and 0.086g plant -1 ); P (blank, 0.079, 0.089, 0.099 and 0.108g plant -1 ) and K (blank, 0.018, 0.020, 0.023 and 0.025g plant -1 ), and the results were shown the effect of N on shoot and root growth in wheat T3. Moreover, the same treatment was decreased in weed. The growth of shoot and root in wheat T2 was affected using P treatment and also same treatment was decreased in weed. K treatment was affected on the growth of shoot and root in wheat T3, and same treatment decreased weed. (3) The Clodinafop-propargyl 0.05; 0.1; 0.2 and 0.3%/100ml, and Starane applied at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2g/100ml concentration were applied for seed germination with same experiments. Herbicide Clodinafop-propargyl was affected more in T2, and herbicide Starane in T3 on weeds. The physiological (Length, number and diameter of shoot and root), and biochemical (POD) parameters were measured. POD enzyme showed more activity in N: P: K fertilizers in T-4. It showed that (Starane and fertilizer concentration (N, P, K) 3.91g/m 2 , 4.455g/m 2 and 1.155g/m 2 ) resulted in optimum wheat physiological growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellaria medium grew more than ordinary chickweed under NPK treatment in wheat.

Treatment
NPK treatmente0
Interactor
Stellaria mediume0weed
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
ordinary chickweede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stellaria medium grew more than ordinary chickweed with NPK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer decreased weed growth in the wheat trial.

Treatment
Ne1
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weede2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“the results were shown the effect of N on shoot and root growth in wheat T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moreover, the same treatment was decreased in weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P treatment decreased weed in the wheat trial.

Treatment
P treatmente3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weede3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“The growth of shoot and root in wheat T2 was affected using P treatment and also same treatment was decreased in weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K treatment decreased weed in the wheat trial.

Treatment
K treatmente4
Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
weede4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“K treatment was affected on the growth of shoot and root in wheat T3, and same treatment decreased weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen affected shoot and root growth of wheat T3; direction not stated.

Treatment
Ne1
Outcome
shoot and root growthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the results were shown the effect of N on shoot and root growth in wheat T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P treatment affected shoot and root growth of wheat T2; direction not stated.

Treatment
P treatmente3
Outcome
growth of shoot and roote3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The growth of shoot and root in wheat T2 was affected using P treatment and also same treatment was decreased in weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K treatment affected shoot and root growth of wheat T3; direction not stated.

Treatment
K treatmente4
Outcome
growth of shoot and roote4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“K treatment was affected on the growth of shoot and root in wheat T3, and same treatment decreased weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl affected weeds more in T2.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyle5
Interactor
weedse5weed
Outcome
weedse5
Direction
moree5
Qualifier
in T2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“Herbicide Clodinafop-propargyl was affected more in T2, and herbicide Starane in T3 on weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starane affected weeds more in T3.

Treatment
Staranee5
Interactor
weedse5weed
Outcome
weedse5
Direction
moree5
Qualifier
in T3e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“Herbicide Clodinafop-propargyl was affected more in T2, and herbicide Starane in T3 on weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD enzyme activity was higher under N: P: K fertilizers in T-4.

Treatment
N: P: K fertilizerse6
Gene
POD enzymee6
Outcome
activitye6
Direction
moree6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“herbicide and fertilizer on wheat and weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“POD enzyme showed more activity in N: P: K fertilizers in T-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starane and fertilizer concentrations gave optimum wheat physiological growth.

Treatment
Starane and fertilizer concentration (N, P, K)e7
Outcome
physiological growthe7
Direction
optimume7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“It showed that (Starane and fertilizer concentration (N, P, K) 3.91g/m 2 , 4.455g/m 2 and 1.155g/m 2 ) resulted in optimum wheat physiological growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1595 · show in text ↑

potassium · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

potassium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 66 positive, 13 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.