Abstract
In Navsari, Gujarat, at the College Farm of Navsari Agricultural University, a field experiment was conducted in the summer and kharif of 2021 and 2022. With 4 main plots and 6 subplot treatments, the experiment comprised of twenty-four treatment combinations that were replicated 3 times in a split plot design. Results posed that significantly higher milling quality parameters and protein content of rice was found when rice grown in dhaincha incorporated plots (T3) and it was followed by green gram (T1), cowpea (T2) incorporated plots, and significantly lower values were seen in the fallow treatment (T4) for both years and in the pooled analysis. However, amylose and amylopectin content in rice was non-significant during the study. In the case of recommended levels tested during kharif in rice, significantly higher values of milling quality parameters, amylose, amylopectin, and protein content percentage were higher with application of 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4) during 2021-2022 and in pooled basis. Whereas the treatment No-fertilizer application (W6) recorded lower values throughout both the years and on a pooled basis. The experimentation revealed that dhaincha incorporation and 100% RDF proved as better in enhancing milling quality attributes and protein content whereas amylose and amylopectin percentages did not vary under residue incorporation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Dhaincha incorporation gave significantly higher rice milling quality and protein content than green gram and cowpea incorporation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- dhaincha incorporated plots (T3)e0
- Outcome
- milling quality parameters and protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- green gram (T1), cowpea (T2) incorporated plotse0
- Setting
- College Farm of Navsari Agricultural Universitye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e0“significantly higher milling quality parameters and protein content of rice was found when rice grown in dhaincha incorporated plots (T3) and it was followed by green gram (T1), cowpea (T2) incorporated plots, and significantly lower values were seen in the fallow treatment (T4)”
e1“In Navsari, Gujarat, at the College Farm of Navsari Agricultural University, a field experiment was conducted in the summer and kharif of 2021 and 2022”
Claim · model-written summary
Fallow gave significantly lower rice milling quality and protein content.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- fallow treatment (T4)e0
- Outcome
- milling quality parameters and protein contente0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e0“significantly higher milling quality parameters and protein content of rice was found when rice grown in dhaincha incorporated plots (T3) and it was followed by green gram (T1), cowpea (T2) incorporated plots, and significantly lower values were seen in the fallow treatment (T4)”
Claim · model-written summary
Amylose and amylopectin content of rice did not differ significantly during the study.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- amylose and amylopectin contente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e2“amylose and amylopectin content in rice was non-significant during the study”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF and 75% RDF plus 25% N from FYM gave higher rice milling quality parameters.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4)e3
- Outcome
- milling quality parameterse3
- Direction
- highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e3“significantly higher values of milling quality parameters, amylose, amylopectin, and protein content percentage were higher with application of 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF and 75% RDF plus 25% N from FYM gave higher amylose, amylopectin and protein content percentage in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4)e3
- Outcome
- amylose, amylopectin, and protein content percentagee3
- Direction
- highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e3“significantly higher values of milling quality parameters, amylose, amylopectin, and protein content percentage were higher with application of 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4)”
Claim · model-written summary
No-fertilizer application gave lower rice milling quality parameters and protein content throughout both years and pooled.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- No-fertilizer application (W6)e4
- Outcome
- milling quality parameterse3
- Direction
- lowere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e4“Whereas the treatment No-fertilizer application (W6) recorded lower values throughout both the years and on a pooled basis”
e3“significantly higher values of milling quality parameters, amylose, amylopectin, and protein content percentage were higher with application of 100% RDF (W1) and fb 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4)”
Claim · model-written summary
Residue incorporation did not change amylose and amylopectin percentages of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- residue incorporatione5
- Outcome
- amylose and amylopectin percentagese5
- Direction
- did not varye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality parameters of succeeding Kharif rice”
e5“amylose and amylopectin percentages did not vary under residue incorporation”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →rotation · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →organic · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.