Paper · 2023 · Big Data In Agriculture

EFFECT OF PINCHING ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF MARIGOLD

Sagar Raza chandio; Mehtab Rai Meghwar; Ali Bux Shar; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tando Jam, Sindh, Pakistan, to evaluate the effect of pinching on growth and yield of marigold. The experiment was conducted in Randomized complete block Design (RCBD). The study comprised of six different pinching treatments including T1= Control-No pinching, T2= Pinching after 10 days of transplanting, T3= pinching after 15 days of transplanting, T4= Pinching after 20 days of transplanting, T5= pinching after 25 days of transplanting, T6= pinching after 30 days of transplanting each treatment was replicated three times. The results indicated a significant effect of the pinching treatments observations were recorded for plant height (cm), number of flower per plant, number of branches per plant, fresh biomass of flower (g), flower diameter (cm), number of leaves per plant. It was found that all studied attributes were statically significant (P<0.05) and influenced by pinching. The maximum plant height (18.63 cm) was obtained from T5=pinching after 25 days of transplanting, pinching after 30 days of transplanting T6 produced maximum number of flower per plant (23.71), and maximum branches per plant (4.74), maximum fresh biomass of flower (7.04 g) were observed at T5= pinching after 25 days of transplanting, followed by T6 = pinching after 30 days of transplanting (6.5 g). Pinching after 30 days of transplanting T6 resulted in diameter of flower cm (14.800), and maximum number of leaves per plant (390.39), and minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 25 days gave maximum plant height, 18.63 cm.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
pinching after 25 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
18.63 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant height (18.63 cm) was obtained from T5=pinching after 25 days of transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 30 days gave the maximum number of flowers per plant, 23.71.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
pinching after 30 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
number of flower per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.71e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pinching after 30 days of transplanting T6 produced maximum number of flower per plant (23.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 25 days gave maximum branches per plant, 4.74.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
pinching after 25 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.74e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum branches per plant (4.74), maximum fresh biomass of flower (7.04 g) were observed at T5= pinching after 25 days of transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 25 days gave maximum fresh flower biomass, 7.04 g.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
pinching after 25 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
fresh biomass of flowere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.04 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum branches per plant (4.74), maximum fresh biomass of flower (7.04 g) were observed at T5= pinching after 25 days of transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 30 days gave fresh flower biomass of 6.5 g, below the 25-day treatment.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
pinching after 30 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
fresh biomass of flowere0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
6.5 ge0
Comparator
pinching after 25 days of transplantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum fresh biomass of flower (7.04 g) were observed at T5= pinching after 25 days of transplanting, followed by T6 = pinching after 30 days of transplanting (6.5 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 30 days gave flower diameter of 14.800 cm.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Pinching after 30 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
diameter of flowere0
Value
14.800e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching after 30 days of transplanting T6 resulted in diameter of flower cm (14.800)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching at 30 days gave maximum leaves per plant, 390.39.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Pinching after 30 days of transplantinge0
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
390.39e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching after 30 days of transplanting T6 resulted in diameter of flower cm (14.800), and maximum number of leaves per plant (390.39)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum plant height, 10.4 cm.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.4 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum flowers per plant, 15.31.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
number of flower per plante0
Direction
minimume0
Value
15.31e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum branches per plant, 2.95.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
minimume0
Value
2.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum fresh flower biomass, 3.73 g.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
fresh biomass of flowere0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.73 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum flower diameter, 9.340 cm.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
minimume0
Value
9.340e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No pinching gave minimum leaves per plant, 243.26.

Taxon
MARIGOLDt0
Treatment
Control-No pinchinge0
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
minimume0
Value
243.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum plant height (10.4 cm), minimum number of flower per plant (15.31) minimum number of branches per plant (2.95) minimum fresh biomass of flower (3.73 g) minimum flower diameter (9.340) cm, and the minimum number of leaves per plant (243.26) was observed from the T1 Control-No pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“MARIGOLD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · yield · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.