Paper · 2012 · Progressive Agriculture

Effect of spacing and pinching on regulation of flowering in ‘African’ marigold’ (Tegetes erecta linn.) under submontane low hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Arvind Sharma; Shweta Chaudhary; Ranjana Bhatia

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The rainy season marigold crop in low hill areas of HP tends to grow taller with few laterals owing to favorable warm humid conditions following monsoon season, resulting in only marginal profit to the farmers. With a view to increase plants spread and maximize flower production, different spacing and dates of pinching of terminals shoots, were tried in a locally acclaimed variety of ‘African’ marigold, during 2008–09 and 2009–2010. The highest flower yield of 203.00q/ha was obtained with a combination of plant spacing at 45x60cm (S3) and pinching of terminal shoots on 30th day after transplanting (P2). This combination (S3P2) which was superior to the flower yields obtained under solo applications i.e. either spacing or pinching was accompanied by better plant growth, larger and higher number of flower per plants and therefore, considered optimum for high flower yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 45x60cm with pinching on day 30 gave the highest flower yield, 203.00q/ha.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
plant spacing at 45x60cm (S3) and pinching of terminal shoots on 30th day after transplanting (P2)e0
Outcome
flower yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
203.00q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest flower yield of 203.00q/ha was obtained with a combination of plant spacing at 45x60cm (S3) and pinching of terminal shoots on 30th day after transplanting (P2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined spacing and pinching treatment gave higher flower yield than either treatment alone.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
combination (S3P2)e0
Outcome
flower yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
solo applications i.e. either spacing or pinchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“This combination (S3P2) which was superior to the flower yields obtained under solo applications i.e. either spacing or pinching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was accompanied by better plant growth, larger flowers, and more flowers per plant.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
better plant growth, larger and higher number of flower per plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“was accompanied by better plant growth, larger and higher number of flower per plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered the combined treatment optimal for high flower yield.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
optimum for high flower yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“therefore, considered optimum for high flower yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · yield · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.