Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal of Nepal

Increasing the Productivity of Lentil through Agronomic Interventions in Nepal

Anil Pokhrel; Tika Bahadur Karki; Sangharsh Raj Dangi

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The low productivity of lentil due to adaptation of poor crop management practices is the main problem of the lentil production in western terai region of Nepal. With an objective of selecting appropriate variety, sowing time, sowing method, seeding rate, priming techniques and weed management practice for lentil cultivation four different experiments were conducted at Grain Legumes Research Program, Khajura, Banke in two winter seasons of 2017/18 and 2018/19. The experiment on sowing time was conducted in split-plot design including four lentil varieties and four sowing dates, while the seeding rate experiment was laid out in split-split-plot design with the treatments of two varieties, two sowing methods and four seed rates. Similarly, seed priming and weed management trails were conducted in RCBD with ten treatments. All the experiments were replicated three times. The highest seed yield of lentil was recorded from the early maturing lentil varieties, i.e. PL 4 (934 kg ha–1) and ILL 7979 (864 kg ha–1). Similarly, lentil sowing on October (940 kg ha–1) produced the higher seed yield than sowing on November (682 kg ha–1). Likewise, the highest seed yield of lentil was recorded from the use of seeding rate 60 kg ha–1 (890 kg ha–1), but it was statistically at par with the seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1 (865 kg ha–1) and 50 kg ha–1 (855 kg ha–1). Differently, the seed yield of lentil didn’t differ significantly under line (856 kg ha–1) and broadcasting (847 kg ha–1) methods of sowing. The seed priming with a 250 ppm solution of sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) produced significantly the highest seed yield (961 kg ha–1) in lentil. Similarly, the highest and statistically similar seed yield of lentil was recorded with the weed management practice of two hand weeding (924 kg ha–1) and the use of Pendimethalin (898 kg ha–1) and Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyl (857 kg ha–1) as a pre-emergence. Thus, the adaptation of appropriate variety, planting time, seeding rate, seed priming technique, sowing method and weed management practices are the major factors of production for getting higher yield of lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PL 4 gave the highest lentil seed yield, 934 kg ha–1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Material
PL 4e0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
higheste0
Value
934 kg ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield of lentil was recorded from the early maturing lentil varieties, i.e. PL 4 (934 kg ha–1) and ILL 7979 (864 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1020 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILL 7979 gave 864 kg ha–1 seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Material
ILL 7979e0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
higheste0
Value
864 kg ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield of lentil was recorded from the early maturing lentil varieties, i.e. PL 4 (934 kg ha–1) and ILL 7979 (864 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

October sowing produced 940 kg ha–1, more than November sowing at 682 kg ha–1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
sowing on Octobere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
940 kg ha–1e0
Qualifier
682 kg ha–1e0
Comparator
sowing on Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil sowing on October (940 kg ha–1) produced the higher seed yield than sowing on November (682 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60 kg ha–1 seeding rate yielded 890 kg ha–1, the highest seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
seeding rate 60 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
higheste0
Value
890 kg ha–1e0
Comparator
seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield of lentil was recorded from the use of seeding rate 60 kg ha–1 (890 kg ha–1), but it was statistically at par with the seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1 (865 kg ha–1) and 50 kg ha–1 (855 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 kg ha–1 seeding rate yielded 865 kg ha–1 and was statistically at par with 60 kg ha–1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Value
865 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was statistically at par with the seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1 (865 kg ha–1) and 50 kg ha–1 (855 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50 kg ha–1 seeding rate yielded 855 kg ha–1 and was statistically at par with 60 kg ha–1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
50 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Value
855 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was statistically at par with the seeding rates of 40 kg ha–1 (865 kg ha–1) and 50 kg ha–1 (855 kg ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Line sowing yielded 856 kg ha–1 without a significant difference from broadcasting.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
linee0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
didn’t differ significantlye0
Value
856 kg ha–1e0
Qualifier
847 kg ha–1e0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield of lentil didn’t differ significantly under line (856 kg ha–1) and broadcasting (847 kg ha–1) methods of sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium molybdate seed priming produced the highest lentil seed yield at 961 kg ha–1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
seed priming with a 250 ppm solution of sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
961 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed priming with a 250 ppm solution of sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) produced significantly the highest seed yield (961 kg ha–1) in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave 924 kg ha–1 lentil seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
higheste0
Value
924 kg ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and statistically similar seed yield of lentil was recorded with the weed management practice of two hand weeding (924 kg ha–1) and the use of Pendimethalin (898 kg ha–1) and Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyl (857 kg ha–1) as a pre-emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin weed management gave 898 kg ha–1 lentil seed yield, statistically similar to hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pendimethaline0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
statistically similare0
Value
898 kg ha–1e0
Comparator
two hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and statistically similar seed yield of lentil was recorded with the weed management practice of two hand weeding (924 kg ha–1) and the use of Pendimethalin (898 kg ha–1) and Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyl (857 kg ha–1) as a pre-emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyl weed management gave 857 kg ha–1 lentil seed yield, statistically similar to hand weeding.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyle0
Outcome
seed yield of lentile0
Direction
statistically similare0
Value
857 kg ha–1e0
Comparator
two hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and statistically similar seed yield of lentil was recorded with the weed management practice of two hand weeding (924 kg ha–1) and the use of Pendimethalin (898 kg ha–1) and Pendimethalin-Quizolofop-ethyl (857 kg ha–1) as a pre-emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1910 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sodium molybdate (anhydrous) · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.