Paper · 2000 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Effect of temperature, seeding date, fungicide seed treatment and inoculation with Fusarium avenaceum on seedling survival, root rot severity and yield of lentil

S. F. Hwang; B. D. Gossen; G. D. Turnbull; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Early seeding of lentil is necessary on the northern prairies to ensure that the crop has time to mature. However, planting into cold soils in spring results in slow germination, which may predispose seedlings to infection by soil-borne pathogens. In a controlled-environment study of the impact of temperature on infection of lentil seedlings (cv. Eston) byFusarium avenaceum, root rot symptoms were most severe at warm temperatures (20° to 27.5 °C) and declined in warmer or cooler soils. Field plots were seeded on three dates, which were spaced about 2 wk apart between early May and early June in four station years. Seedling emergence was most consistent and seed yield was highest in three of four sites at the second seeding date. Emergence and yield were substantially lower for the latest seeding date. Inoculation with F. avenaceum reduced establishment and seed yield. Seed treatment with Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin) improved seedling survival, reduced root rot severity and increased seed yield relative to the inoculated control. Vitaflo-280 (thiram and carbathiin) also improved establishment and yield, but the effect was not as strong or consistent. Treatment with Raxil (tebuconazole) and Apron (metalaxyl) had no effect. The pathogenicity of aggressive isolates of F. avenaceum from lentil on a range of crop species was evaluated. All crops were susceptible to some degree, which indicates that the pathogen, once established, is likely to persist in a field for some time. This study demonstrated that early planting was required for maximum yield, that certain isolates of F. avenaceum were pathogenic on a wide range of hosts, and that seed treatment can be used to minimize losses from seedling blight and root rot in lentil. Key words: Lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus), Fusarium avenaceum, root rot, seeding date, thiabendazole, carbathiin, thiram, tebuconazole

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot was most severe at 20° to 27.5 °C.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
warm temperatures (20° to 27.5 °C)e0
Outcome
root rot symptomse0
Direction
most severee0
Comparator
warmer or cooler soilse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root rot symptoms were most severe at warm temperatures (20° to 27.5 °C) and declined in warmer or cooler soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emergence was most consistent at the second sowing date.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
second seeding datee0
Outcome
Seedling emergencee0
Direction
most consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling emergence was most consistent and seed yield was highest in three of four sites at the second seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was highest at the second sowing date in three of four sites.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
second seeding datee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
three of four sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield was highest in three of four sites at the second seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Latest sowing substantially lowered emergence and yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
latest seeding datee0
Outcome
Emergence and yielde0
Direction
substantially lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emergence and yield were substantially lower for the latest seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation reduced plant establishment.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Inoculation with F. avenaceume0
Interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
establishmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with F. avenaceum reduced establishment and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation reduced seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Inoculation with F. avenaceume0
Interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with F. avenaceum reduced establishment and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown increased survival, reduced root rot and increased yield versus inoculated control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin)e0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin) improved seedling survival, reduced root rot severity and increased seed yield relative to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown reduced root rot severity.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin)e0
Outcome
root rot severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin) improved seedling survival, reduced root rot severity and increased seed yield relative to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown increased seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Crown (thiabendazole and carbathiin) improved seedling survival, reduced root rot severity and increased seed yield relative to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaflo-280 improved establishment and yield, less consistently than Crown.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Vitaflo-280 (thiram and carbathiin)e0
Outcome
establishment and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
not as strong or consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitaflo-280 (thiram and carbathiin) also improved establishment and yield, but the effect was not as strong or consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raxil and Apron had no effect.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Raxil (tebuconazole)e0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Raxil (tebuconazole) and Apron (metalaxyl) had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apron had no effect.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Apron (metalaxyl)e0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Raxil (tebuconazole) and Apron (metalaxyl) had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested crops were susceptible to some degree.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
susceptible to some degreee0

Verbatim

e0

“All crops were susceptible to some degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing was required for maximum yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
early plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early planting was required for maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment can minimize lentil seedling blight and root rot losses.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
seed treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment can be used to minimize losses from seedling blight and root rot in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1757 · show in text ↑

thiram · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carboxin · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carboxin · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carboxin · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

sowing time · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.