Paper · 2023 · Ciência Rural

Hydrogen peroxide as a saline stress attenuator in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

Iracy Amélia Pereira Lopes; Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares; Geovani Soares de Lima; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Okra is a vegetable that stands out for its low production cost, high yield, high nutritional and value and socioeconomic importance in income generation, especially in family farming. In this context, the present study evaluated the physiology, production and water use efficiency of okra under irrigation with saline water and exogenous application of hydrogen peroxide. The treatments were distributed in a randomized block design, in a 5 × 3 factorial arrangement, with five levels of electrical conductivity of irrigation water - ECw (0.3; 1.3; 2.3; 3.3 and 4.3 dS m-1) and three concentrations of hydrogen peroxide - H2O2 (0, 25 and 50 μM), with five replicates, totaling 75 plants. Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance, transpiration, number of fruits, total production and water use efficiency of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80. Hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 22 μM mitigated the effects of salt stress on CO2 assimilation rate, number of fruits, average fruit weight and total production of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80. Water use efficiency is favored by H2O2 application at concentration of 12 μM, especially in plants irrigated with ECw of 0.3 dS m-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance and transpiration of okra.

Material
Clemson Americano 80e0
Treatment
Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1e0
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiratione0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Comparator
0.3 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance, transpiration, number of fruits, total production and water use efficiency of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected number of fruits and total production of okra.

Material
Clemson Americano 80e0
Treatment
Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1e0
Outcome
number of fruits, total productione0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Comparator
0.3 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance, transpiration, number of fruits, total production and water use efficiency of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected water use efficiency of okra.

Material
Clemson Americano 80e0
Treatment
Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Comparator
0.3 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance, transpiration, number of fruits, total production and water use efficiency of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide at 22 μM mitigated salt stress effects on CO2 assimilation rate of okra.

Material
Clemson Americano 80e0
Treatment
Hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 22 μMe0
Outcome
CO2 assimilation ratee0
Direction
mitigatede0
Qualifier
effects of salt stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 22 μM mitigated the effects of salt stress on CO2 assimilation rate, number of fruits, average fruit weight and total production of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide at 22 μM mitigated salt stress effects on number of fruits, average fruit weight and total production of okra.

Material
Clemson Americano 80e0
Treatment
Hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 22 μMe0
Outcome
number of fruits, average fruit weight and total productione0
Direction
mitigatede0
Qualifier
effects of salt stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen peroxide at concentration of 22 μM mitigated the effects of salt stress on CO2 assimilation rate, number of fruits, average fruit weight and total production of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide at 12 μM favored water use efficiency of okra, especially at 0.3 dS m-1 irrigation water.

Treatment
H2O2 application at concentration of 12 μMe0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
favorede0
Qualifier
especially in plants irrigated with ECw of 0.3 dS m-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency is favored by H2O2 application at concentration of 12 μM, especially in plants irrigated with ECw of 0.3 dS m-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1220 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation with ECw above 0.3 dS m-1 negatively affected stomatal conductance, transpiration, number of fruits, total production and water use efficiency of okra cv. Clemson Americano 80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–885 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.