Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (University of Kassel)

Evaluating partial root-zone irrigation and mulching in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) under a sub-humid tropical climate

Panigrahi, Pravukalyan; Sahu, Narendra Nath; Pradhan, Sanatan

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted to compare the alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI) with and without black plastic mulch (BPM) with full root-zone irrigation (FRI) in furrow-irrigated okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) at Bhubaneswar, India. APRI means that one of the two neighbouring furrows was alternately irrigated during consecutive watering. FRI was the conventional method where every furrow was irrigated during each watering. The used irrigation levels were 25% available soil moisture depletion (ASMD), 50% ASMD, and 75% ASMD. The plant growth and yield parameters were observed to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher with frequent irrigation (at 25% ASMD) under all irrigation strategies. However, APRI + BPM produced the maximum plant growth and yield using 22% and 56% less water over APRI without BPM and FRI, respectively. The highest pod yield (10025 kg ha-1) was produced under APRI at 25% ASMD + BPM, which was statistically at par with the pod yield under APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM. Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), which indicates the pod yield per unit quantity of irrigation water, was estimated to be highest (12.3 kg m-3) under APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM, followed by APRI at 25% ASMD + BPM. Moreover, the treatment APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM was found economically superior to other treatments, generating more net return (US $ 952 ha-1) with higher benefit–cost ratio (1.70).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent irrigation at 25% ASMD significantly raised growth and yield under all irrigation strategies.

Treatment
frequent irrigation (at 25% ASMD)e0
Outcome
plant growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Bhubaneswar, Indiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant growth and yield parameters were observed to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher with frequent irrigation (at 25% ASMD) under all irrigation strategies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Bhubaneswar, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI with black plastic mulch produced maximum plant growth with less water than unmulched APRI and FRI.

Treatment
APRI + BPMe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
APRI without BPM and FRIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APRI + BPM produced the maximum plant growth and yield using 22% and 56% less water over APRI without BPM and FRI, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI with black plastic mulch produced maximum yield.

Treatment
APRI + BPMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
APRI without BPM and FRIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APRI + BPM produced the maximum plant growth and yield using 22% and 56% less water over APRI without BPM and FRI, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI with mulch used 22% less water than unmulched APRI.

Treatment
APRI + BPMe0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
APRI without BPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APRI + BPM produced the maximum plant growth and yield using 22% and 56% less water over APRI without BPM and FRI, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI with mulch used 56% less water than FRI.

Treatment
APRI + BPMe0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
FRIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“APRI + BPM produced the maximum plant growth and yield using 22% and 56% less water over APRI without BPM and FRI, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI at 25% ASMD with mulch gave the highest pod yield, 10025 kg ha-1, statistically at par with APRI at 50% ASMD with mulch.

Treatment
APRI at 25% ASMD + BPMe0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10025 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
APRI at 50% ASMD + BPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pod yield (10025 kg ha-1) was produced under APRI at 25% ASMD + BPM, which was statistically at par with the pod yield under APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency was highest at 12.3 kg m-3 under APRI at 50% ASMD with mulch.

Treatment
APRI at 50% ASMD + BPMe0
Outcome
Irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.3 kg m-3e0
Comparator
APRI at 25% ASMD + BPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), which indicates the pod yield per unit quantity of irrigation water, was estimated to be highest (12.3 kg m-3) under APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM, followed by APRI at 25% ASMD + BPM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI at 50% ASMD with mulch was economically superior and gave US $ 952 ha-1 net return.

Treatment
APRI at 50% ASMD + BPMe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
moree0
Value
US $ 952 ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM was found economically superior to other treatments, generating more net return (US $ 952 ha-1) with higher benefit–cost ratio (1.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI at 50% ASMD with mulch gave a higher benefit–cost ratio of 1.70.

Treatment
APRI at 50% ASMD + BPMe0
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.70e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment APRI at 50% ASMD + BPM was found economically superior to other treatments, generating more net return (US $ 952 ha-1) with higher benefit–cost ratio (1.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–88 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

mulching · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

irrigation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Irrigation increased okra fruit yield over unirrigated controls.

    Effect of Irrigation on the Growth and Yield of Okra · 1987 · compared with unirrigated control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

mulching · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

soil water · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.