Paper · 2023 · Journal of Horticultural Research

The Growth Activity and Productivity of Apple Trees Depending on the Form of the Crown and the Time of Pruning

Andrii Chaploutskyi; Oleksandra Polunina; Inna Kucher; et al.

8
claims
28
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The apple tree is the most common fruit crop in the temperate climate zone. Modern intensive fruit cultivation involves the use of new, highly productive cultivars and cultivation technologies, thanks to the creation of small crown shapes with an increased number of trees per hectare. Reducing planting patterns and creating more dense plantation systems can significantly improve their yields. However, the limiting factor that can reduce tree productivity and deteriorate fruit quality is the degree of crown illumination. Ensuring even access of sunlight to all parts of the crown is the main task in the formation and pruning trees. The study aimed to determine the effect of crown pruning at BBCH 0 (winter) and BBCH 74 (early summer) and various types of crown formation on the growth activity and productivity of ‘Fuji’ and ‘Honeycrisp’ apple trees. A significant decrease (20%) in the number of newly formed shoots in the form of the French axis crown compared to the ballerina and slender spindle crowns was found. However, their length and total growth were significantly higher. The formation of the ballerina crown (with the removal of overgrown wood in the 25 cm zone on the central conductor above the lower tier of semi-cross-branched branches) contributed to a decrease in shoot length and total growth. The introduction of crown pruning in the summer also improved crown illumination – shoot length decreased by 17% and total growth by 12%. Specific productivity per bole cross-section and total shoot length was the highest in ballerina crown trees, followed by trees with a slender spindle crown, and trees pruned in winter and summer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

French axis crowns had 20% fewer new shoots than ballerina and spindle crowns.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
French axis crowne0
Outcome
number of newly formed shootse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
ballerina and slender spindle crownse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease (20%) in the number of newly formed shoots in the form of the French axis crown compared to the ballerina and slender spindle crowns was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

French axis shoots were significantly longer.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
French axis crowne1
Outcome
lengthe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, their length and total growth were significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant decrease (20%) in the number of newly formed shoots in the form of the French axis crown compared to the ballerina and slender spindle crowns was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

French axis total shoot growth was significantly higher.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
French axis crowne1
Outcome
total growthe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, their length and total growth were significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant decrease (20%) in the number of newly formed shoots in the form of the French axis crown compared to the ballerina and slender spindle crowns was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ballerina crown formation decreased shoot length and total growth.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
formation of the ballerina crowne0
Outcome
shoot length and total growthe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The formation of the ballerina crown (with the removal of overgrown wood in the 25 cm zone on the central conductor above the lower tier of semi-cross-branched branches) contributed to a decrease in shoot length and total growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning improved crown illumination.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
crown pruning in the summere0
Outcome
crown illuminatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of crown pruning in the summer also improved crown illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning reduced shoot length by 17%.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruning in the summere1
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length decreased by 17% and total growth by 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“The introduction of crown pruning in the summer also improved crown illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning reduced total growth by 12%.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
pruning in the summere1
Outcome
total growthe0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length decreased by 17% and total growth by 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“The introduction of crown pruning in the summer also improved crown illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ballerina crowns had highest specific productivity, ahead of slender spindle.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Material
ballerina crown treese0
Outcome
Specific productivity per bole cross-section and total shoot lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
trees with a slender spindle crowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific productivity per bole cross-section and total shoot length was the highest in ballerina crown trees, followed by trees with a slender spindle crown, and trees pruned in winter and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑

crown compound · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

pruning · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 58 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.