Paper · 2023 · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Understanding the potential role played by major flavonoid components of apple leaves in plant defense against herbivorous arthropods.

Coli, William M.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field, greenhouse, and laboratory studies were conducted with the following objectives: (1) develop an efficient extraction and analytical method for determining concentration of major flavonoids in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) leaves, (2) determine if differences exist in levels of these components in leaves of ten apple cultivars and if these differences explain variation in cultivar susceptibility to spider mites ( Acari: Tetranychidae), (3) understand the effects of varying light and nutritional regimes on apple leaf flavonoid levels, (4) assess if the flavonoid phloridzin, when applied to bush bean plants, affects Two Spotted Spider Mite population density, and (5) Determine if summer pruning of mature, field-grown apple trees influences levels of foliar phloridzin. An efficient extraction and HPLC analytical method is presented using commonly available and least toxic solvents and an isocratic HPLC run of short duration allowing calculation of unknown concentrations with a high degree of accuracy. Different cultivars showed significant differences in mite susceptibility and in phloridzin concentration in leaves. However, phloridzin differences do not appear to explain variation in cultivar susceptibility to spider mites. Greenhouse trials indicated that phloridzin concentration was significantly lower in leaves of potted trees of the four cultivars tested under 70% shade cloth than under full sun. All cultivars responded similarly to sun or shade in regard to percent dry weight phloridzin. Nutrition treatments appeared to have an effect on phloridzin levels only in 1995. Horticultural bush bean plants (Phaeseolus vulgaris) were either sprayed or injected through a cotton wick with 0.01 M phloridzin or distilled water, and seeded with 5 gravid female Tetranychus urticae mites. Phloridzin, either when applied topically to bean plants, or when introduced into the transpirational stream via a cotton wick, resulted in smaller numbers of T. urticae compared to plants which were not treated with phloridzin. Summer pruning of mature, field grown “McIntosh” apple had no effect on phloridzin concentration, likely indicating that summer pruning is not a stimulus of induced changes in flavonoid content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An efficient, accurate extraction and HPLC method for apple leaf flavonoids was presented.

Outcome
calculation of unknown concentrations with a high degree of accuracye0
Comparator
commonly available and least toxic solventse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An efficient extraction and HPLC analytical method is presented using commonly available and least toxic solvents and an isocratic HPLC run of short duration allowing calculation of unknown concentrations with a high degree of accuracy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple cultivars differed significantly in mite susceptibility.

Material
cultivarse0
Interactor
mitee0pest
Outcome
mite susceptibilitye0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different cultivars showed significant differences in mite susceptibility and in phloridzin concentration in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple cultivars differed significantly in leaf phloridzin concentration.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
phloridzin concentration in leavese0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different cultivars showed significant differences in mite susceptibility and in phloridzin concentration in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phloridzin differences did not appear to explain cultivar variation in spider mite susceptibility.

Interactor
spider mitesTetranychidaee0pest
Compound
phloridzine0
Outcome
cultivar susceptibility to spider mitese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phloridzin differences do not appear to explain variation in cultivar susceptibility to spider mites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 70% shade cloth, apple leaf phloridzin concentration was significantly lower than in full sun.

Treatment
70% shade clothe0
Outcome
phloridzin concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
four cultivarse0
Comparator
full sune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phloridzin concentration was significantly lower in leaves of potted trees of the four cultivars tested under 70% shade cloth than under full sun.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four apple cultivars responded similarly to sun and shade in percent dry weight phloridzin.

Outcome
percent dry weight phloridzine0
Direction
similarlye0
Qualifier
sun or shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All cultivars responded similarly to sun or shade in regard to percent dry weight phloridzin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrition treatments appeared to affect apple phloridzin levels only in 1995.

Treatment
Nutrition treatmentse0
Outcome
phloridzin levelse0
Qualifier
only in 1995e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrition treatments appeared to have an effect on phloridzin levels only in 1995.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topically applied phloridzin reduced T. urticae numbers on bean plants relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
bean plantse0
Treatment
Phloridzine0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
numbers of T. urticaee0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
applied topicallye0
Comparator
plants which were not treated with phloridzine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phloridzin, either when applied topically to bean plants, or when introduced into the transpirational stream via a cotton wick, resulted in smaller numbers of T. urticae compared to plants which were not treated with phloridzin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–2043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phloridzin introduced by wick reduced T. urticae numbers on bean plants relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
bean plantse0
Treatment
Phloridzine0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
numbers of T. urticaee0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
introduced into the transpirational stream via a cotton wicke0
Comparator
plants which were not treated with phloridzine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phloridzin, either when applied topically to bean plants, or when introduced into the transpirational stream via a cotton wick, resulted in smaller numbers of T. urticae compared to plants which were not treated with phloridzin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–2043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning of mature McIntosh apple did not affect leaf phloridzin concentration.

Material
McIntoshe0
Treatment
Summer pruninge0
Outcome
phloridzin concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0
Setting
field growne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer pruning of mature, field grown “McIntosh” apple had no effect on phloridzin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2140 · show in text ↑

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.