Paper · 2023 · ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

Using Different Carbon Resources to Enhance Germination and Growth Components of Two Varieties of Sorghum bicolor L.

Shakir Bahaddin Shakir; Ako Hussein Mahmood

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sorghum is regarded as a crop with a dual purpose (grain and forage), however it hasn't been prioritized as a crop in Iraq since it relies on outdated types. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of three different carbon sources (charcoal, sawdust, and white sugar) on the plant growth and yield performance of the two varieties of Sorghum bicolor. The experiment was a complete randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. Overall, seed germination percentages were significantly affected by varieties and treatments. However, the highest germination was recorded in variety one 93.83%. In relevant of effectiveness of different carbon resources on growth characteristics, the outcomes were differed, for example, the effects of all treatments were non-significant for characters’ fresh leaf weight and dry leaf weight compare to control treatment. Although, the highest results were recorded in sawdust treatment (18.83 g) and the lowest response for fresh leaf weight belong to control treatment (10.83 g). Sawdust treatment had also significant influence on fresh yield, dry yield, total fresh yield, and total dry yield of both studied varieties compare to control or other treatments. The outcomes indicated that using sawdust as an organic carbon resources can enhance growth and yield characters when planting sorghum as forage crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and treatment significantly affected seed germination percentages.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
varietiese0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
seed germination percentagese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed germination percentages were significantly affected by varieties and treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety one had the highest germination, 93.83%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
variety onee0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
93.83%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest germination was recorded in variety one 93.83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had nonsignificant effects on fresh and dry leaf weight relative to control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
fresh leaf weight and dry leaf weighte0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of all treatments were non-significant for characters’ fresh leaf weight and dry leaf weight compare to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust had the highest fresh leaf weight, 18.83 g, versus 10.83 g in control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
sawdust treatmente0
Outcome
fresh leaf weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.83 ge0
Qualifier
10.83 ge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest results were recorded in sawdust treatment (18.83 g) and the lowest response for fresh leaf weight belong to control treatment (10.83 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust significantly increased fresh yield compared with control or other treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Sawdust treatmente0
Outcome
fresh yielde0
Comparator
control or other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sawdust treatment had also significant influence on fresh yield, dry yield, total fresh yield, and total dry yield of both studied varieties compare to control or other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust significantly increased dry yield compared with control or other treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Sawdust treatmente0
Outcome
dry yielde0
Comparator
control or other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sawdust treatment had also significant influence on fresh yield, dry yield, total fresh yield, and total dry yield of both studied varieties compare to control or other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust significantly increased total fresh yield compared with control or other treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Sawdust treatmente0
Outcome
total fresh yielde0
Comparator
control or other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sawdust treatment had also significant influence on fresh yield, dry yield, total fresh yield, and total dry yield of both studied varieties compare to control or other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust significantly increased total dry yield compared with control or other treatments.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Sawdust treatmente0
Outcome
total dry yielde0
Comparator
control or other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sawdust treatment had also significant influence on fresh yield, dry yield, total fresh yield, and total dry yield of both studied varieties compare to control or other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–113 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

growing medium · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.