Paper · 2023 · Journal of Bio-Environment Control

Growth and Seedling Quality of Grafted Cucumber Seedlings by Different Cultivars and Supplemental Light Sources of Low Radiation Period and Early Yield of Cucumber after Transplanting

Hyeong Eun Choi; So Yeong Hwang; Ji Hye Yun; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

To harvest marketable cucumbers, high quality seedlings must be used. Producing seedlings in the greenhouse during the low radiation period decreases marketability due to insufficient light for growth. Supplemental lighting with artificial light of different quality can be used to improve low light conditions and produce high quality seedlings. Therefore, this study was conducted to select the appropriate supplemental light sources on the growth and seedling quality of grafted cucumber seedlings during the low radiation period. Three cultivars of cucumber were used as scions for grafting; ‘NakWonSeongcheongjang’, ‘Sinsedae’, and ‘Goodmorning baekdadagi’. Figleaf gourd (Cucurbita ficifolia) ‘Heukjong’ was used as the rootstock. The seeds were sown on January 26, 2023, and grafted on February 9, 2023. After graft-taking, cucumbers in plug trays were treated with RB light-emitting diodes (LED, red and blue LED, red:blue = 8:2), W LED (white LED, R:G:B = 5:3:2), and HPS (high-pressure sodium lamp), respectively. Non-treatment was used as the control. Supplemental lighting was applied 2 hours before sunrise and 2 hours after sunset for 19 days. The stem diameter and fresh and dry weights of roots did not differ significantly by supplemental light sources. The plant height and hypocotyl length were decreased in W LED. However, the leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, and fresh and dry weights of shoots were the highest in the RB LED. Seedling qualities such as crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, and compactness were also increased in RB LED and W LED. After transplanting, most of the growth was not significant, but early yield of cucumber was higher in LED than non-treatment. In conclusion, using RB LED, W LED for supplemental light source during low radiation period in grafted cucumber seedlings improved growth, seedling quality, and early yield of cucumber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB LED gave the highest leaf length, leaf width and leaf area of grafted cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
RB LEDe3
Outcome
leaf length, leaf width, leaf areae3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“the leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, and fresh and dry weights of shoots were the highest in the RB LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB LED gave the highest fresh and dry shoot weights of grafted cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
RB LEDe3
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of shootse3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“the leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, and fresh and dry weights of shoots were the highest in the RB LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W LED decreased plant height and hypocotyl length of grafted cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
W LEDe2
Outcome
plant height and hypocotyl lengthe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plant height and hypocotyl length were decreased in W LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB LED increased crop growth rate, net assimilation rate and compactness of grafted cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
RB LEDe4
Outcome
crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, and compactnesse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seedling qualities such as crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, and compactness were also increased in RB LED and W LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W LED increased crop growth rate, net assimilation rate and compactness of grafted cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
W LEDe4
Outcome
crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, and compactnesse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seedling qualities such as crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, and compactness were also increased in RB LED and W LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter and fresh and dry root weights did not differ significantly among supplemental light sources.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
supplemental light sourcese1
Outcome
stem diameter and fresh and dry weights of rootse1
Direction
did not differe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The stem diameter and fresh and dry weights of roots did not differ significantly by supplemental light sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After transplanting, most growth of cucumber did not differ significantly under LED.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
LEDe5
Outcome
growthe5
Direction
was not significante5
Comparator
non-treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“After transplanting, most of the growth was not significant, but early yield of cucumber was higher in LED than non-treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield of cucumber was higher under LED than without treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
LEDe5
Outcome
early yield of cucumbere5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
non-treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“After transplanting, most of the growth was not significant, but early yield of cucumber was higher in LED than non-treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1701 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

light · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

83 papers: 53 positive, 30 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.