Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Morphological and Physiological Responses of Cucumber Seedlings to Supplemental LED Light under Extremely Low Irradiance

Yiting Zhang; Hao Dong; Shiwei Song; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to inhibit spindling growth and improve quality of cucumber seedlings under low irradiance, effects of supplemental light-emitting diodes (LED) light (SL) on morphological and physiological characteristics of cucumber seedlings at different growth stages under extremely low irradiance (ELI) were investigated. Supplementary monochromatic, dichromatic and trichromatic LED light on cucumber seedlings were conducted in experiment one, and supplements of combination ratios and intensity of blue and red LED light (RB) were conducted in experiment two. The morphological and physiological parameters of cucumber seedlings were promoted effectively by supplemental monochromatic red light or dichromatic containing red light (RB and RG) under ELI as early as one-leaf seedling stage, as demonstrated by suppressed length of hypocotyl and first internode, increased stem diameter and biomass, higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and soluble sugar content. Monochromatic or additional green light was not beneficial to cucumber seedlings under the ELI. The length of shoot and hypocotyl decreased, while stem diameter and leaf area increased as early as one-leaf seedling stage by RB SL. Root activities, root–shoot ratio, activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), as well as palisade–spongy ratio in the leaf of cucumber seedlings were promoted effectively by increasing blue light proportion (1R1B/1R2B). Increasing light intensity (50/75) enhanced soluble sugar accumulation in leaves. There were synergistic effects of RB ratio and light intensity on increasing stem diameter, leaf area, seedling index and decreasing hypocotyl cell area of the vertical section. In conclusion, 1R2B-75 may be the optimal SL to inhibit spindling growth of cucumber seedlings under ELI condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red or red-containing supplemental light suppressed hypocotyl and first internode length.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
supplemental monochromatic red light or dichromatic containing red light (RB and RG)e0
Outcome
length of hypocotyl and first internodee0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The morphological and physiological parameters of cucumber seedlings were promoted effectively by supplemental monochromatic red light or dichromatic containing red light (RB and RG) under ELI as early as one-leaf seedling stage, as demonstrated by suppressed length of hypocotyl and first internode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red or red-containing supplemental light increased stem diameter and biomass.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
stem diameter and biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased stem diameter and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red or red-containing supplemental light gave higher net photosynthetic rate and soluble sugar content.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monochromatic or additional green light was not beneficial under extremely low irradiance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Monochromatic or additional green lighte0
Outcome
not beneficial to cucumber seedlingse0
Setting
ELIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monochromatic or additional green light was not beneficial to cucumber seedlings under the ELI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue supplemental light decreased shoot and hypocotyl length.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
one-leaf seedling stagee0
Treatment
RB SLe0
Outcome
length of shoot and hypocotyle0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of shoot and hypocotyl decreased, while stem diameter and leaf area increased as early as one-leaf seedling stage by RB SL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue supplemental light increased stem diameter and leaf area.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
one-leaf seedling stagee0
Treatment
RB SLe0
Outcome
stem diameter and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem diameter and leaf area increased as early as one-leaf seedling stage by RB SL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher blue-light proportion promoted root activity, root-shoot ratio and leaf palisade-spongy ratio.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
increasing blue light proportion (1R1B/1R2B)e0
Outcome
Root activities, root–shoot ratioe0
Direction
promoted effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root activities, root–shoot ratio, activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), as well as palisade–spongy ratio in the leaf of cucumber seedlings were promoted effectively by increasing blue light proportion (1R1B/1R2B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher blue-light proportion promoted catalase and peroxidase activities and the leaf palisade-spongy ratio.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
increasing blue light proportion (1R1B/1R2B)e0
Outcome
activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), as well as palisade–spongy ratioe0
Direction
promoted effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD), as well as palisade–spongy ratio in the leaf of cucumber seedlings were promoted effectively by increasing blue light proportion (1R1B/1R2B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing light intensity enhanced leaf soluble sugar accumulation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Increasing light intensity (50/75)e0
Outcome
soluble sugar accumulation in leavese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing light intensity (50/75) enhanced soluble sugar accumulation in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue ratio and light intensity synergistically increased stem diameter, leaf area and seedling index.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
RB ratio and light intensitye0
Outcome
stem diameter, leaf area, seedling indexe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were synergistic effects of RB ratio and light intensity on increasing stem diameter, leaf area, seedling index and decreasing hypocotyl cell area of the vertical section”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue ratio and light intensity synergistically decreased hypocotyl cell area.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
RB ratio and light intensitye0
Outcome
hypocotyl cell area of the vertical sectione0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RB ratio and light intensity on increasing stem diameter, leaf area, seedling index and decreasing hypocotyl cell area of the vertical section”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose 1R2B-75 as the optimal supplemental light for limiting spindling.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
1R2B-75 may be the optimal SL to inhibit spindling growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1R2B-75 may be the optimal SL to inhibit spindling growth of cucumber seedlings under ELI condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1795 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

83 papers: 53 positive, 30 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

light · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.