Paper · 2023 · Horticulture Research Journal

B- Alleviating the harmful impact of salinity stress with different levels by using some organic techniques on Chemical characteristics of Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water and soil salinity were the biggest obstacles to achieving the world’s supply - demand ratio, so with the growing population there is no choice but to use salty soil and water in agriculture, and the need for environmentally friendly technologies has emerged to overcome the adverse effects. Therefore, the effect of the halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (HT-PGPR) with organic fertilizers and spirulina algae on the biochemical characters as chlorophyll content, NPK %, total carbohydrates, phenols, proline and antioxidant enzymes activities of pomegranate transplants (Wonderful cv.) under different irrigation water salinity levels (6000, 7000 and 8000 ppm) were investigated. Pot experiment was conducted in Horticulture Research Institute (HRI) nursery, Agriculture research center (ARC), Giza governorate, Egypt, under the greenhouse conditions using compost, halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance) in addition to, Spirulina platensis L. algae in 2019 and 2020. Results indicated that, the organic and biofertilizers reduced soil pH and EC and increased the soil enzymatic activity under saline water condition. The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine. The highest efficiency in alleviating irrigation water salinity stress on pomegranate transplants was obtained from treatment contents compost + biofertilizers + spirulina algae with 6000 ppm salinity level compared to the chemical fertilizer treatment. The results of the study indicated that organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculations can alleviate the deleterious effects of salt stress conditions and improve the tolerance and healthy growth of pomegranate transplant under salt water irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and biofertilizers reduced soil pH under saline water.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
organic and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
saline water conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that, the organic and biofertilizers reduced soil pH and EC and increased the soil enzymatic activity under saline water condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and biofertilizers reduced EC under saline water.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
organic and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
saline water conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that, the organic and biofertilizers reduced soil pH and EC and increased the soil enzymatic activity under saline water condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and biofertilizers increased soil enzymatic activity under saline water.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
organic and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
soil enzymatic activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
saline water conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that, the organic and biofertilizers reduced soil pH and EC and increased the soil enzymatic activity under saline water condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased leaf total chlorophyll in pomegranate transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chrococcume1symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding sodium and chlorinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased leaf carbohydrates in pomegranate transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chrococcume1symbiont
Outcome
carbohydratese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding sodium and chlorinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased leaf phenols in pomegranate transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chrococcume1symbiont
Outcome
phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding sodium and chlorinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased leaf proline in pomegranate transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chrococcume1symbiont
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding sodium and chlorinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased leaf NPK % in pomegranate transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chrococcume1symbiont
Outcome
NPK %e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding sodium and chlorinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf contents of total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, proline of transplants were increased, in addition to a significant increase in the nutritional elements NPK % in dry leaves were recorded when transplants were treated using PGPR inoculations, excluding sodium and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“halotolerant PGPR (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Bacillus megaterim var. phosphaticum and Bacillus circulance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wonderful cv. Pomegranate Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost, biofertilizers and spirulina algae at 6000 ppm salinity had the highest salinity stress alleviation efficiency compared with chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
pomegranate transplantse0
Treatment
compost + biofertilizers + spirulina algae with 6000 ppm salinity levele0
Outcome
efficiency in alleviating irrigation water salinity stresse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest efficiency in alleviating irrigation water salinity stress on pomegranate transplants was obtained from treatment contents compost + biofertilizers + spirulina algae with 6000 ppm salinity level compared to the chemical fertilizer treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculations can improve pomegranate transplant tolerance under salt water irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranate transplante0
Treatment
organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculationse0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
under salt water irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results of the study indicated that organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculations can alleviate the deleterious effects of salt stress conditions and improve the tolerance and healthy growth of pomegranate transplant under salt water irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–2032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculations can improve pomegranate transplant healthy growth under salt water irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranate transplante0
Treatment
organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculationse0
Outcome
healthy growthe0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
under salt water irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results of the study indicated that organic fertilizers with halotolerant PGPR inoculations can alleviate the deleterious effects of salt stress conditions and improve the tolerance and healthy growth of pomegranate transplant under salt water irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–2032 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.