Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of thiobacillus bacteria on physiology and vegetative growth of pomegranate

Zahra Zare; Mehdi Khayyat; Farhad Azarmi-Atajan

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The climate change and consequent degradation of soil and water resources have led to difficult conditions for farmers; thus, they should make intelligent decisions to face these statuses. Managing soil nutrient and mineral uptake by plants and its feasibility under harsh environment must be considered. Therefore, the present research was conducted to investigate the response of pomegranate variety Shishe Kab to Thiobacillus bacteria (B) and sulfur (S) fertilization. Treatments included sulfur fertilization (three levels: 0, 500 and 1000 g−1 tree) and inoculation with Thiobacillus bacteria (two levels: inoculated and non-inoculated). Totally, sulfur fertilization and inoculation with bacteria improved physiological and biochemical aspects and fruit production of pomegranate. Supplying S decreased soil pH, which the lowest value (5.2) was recorded in 500 g S tree−1 when accompanied with bacteria. Soil electrolyte leakage (EL) increased, when sulfur incorporated or when bacteria added to the soil. The interactive effects of B ×S was significant on fruit diameter and weight, chlorophyll (Chl), carotenoid and potassium content, which were improved, although non-inoculated plants also showed high values of potassium content. Anthocyanin and total carbohydrate improved when bacteria inoculation was done; however, total acidity (TA) and total soluble solids (TSS) showed a significant decrease. The EL variable significantly decreased and tissue water content increased in this experiment, when inoculation or sulfur fertilization was used. The results obtained from present study emphasized on the necessity of using sulfur and Thiobacillus bacteria in increasing growth and yield and also chilling tolerance of pomegranate trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization and inoculation with Thiobacillus bacteria improved physiological and biochemical aspects and fruit production of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
sulfur fertilization and inoculation with bacteriae0
Outcome
physiological and biochemical aspects and fruit productione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfur fertilization and inoculation with bacteria improved physiological and biochemical aspects and fruit production of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying sulfur decreased soil pH in pomegranate plots.

Treatment
Supplying Se0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying S decreased soil pH, which the lowest value (5.2) was recorded in 500 g S tree−1 when accompanied with bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest soil pH (5.2) was recorded with 500 g S per tree combined with bacteria.

Treatment
500 g S tree−1 when accompanied with bacteriae0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.2e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying S decreased soil pH, which the lowest value (5.2) was recorded in 500 g S tree−1 when accompanied with bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil electrolyte leakage increased when sulfur was incorporated or bacteria were added to the soil.

Treatment
sulfur incorporated or when bacteria added to the soile0
Outcome
Soil electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil electrolyte leakage (EL) increased, when sulfur incorporated or when bacteria added to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of Thiobacillus bacteria and sulfur significantly improved pomegranate fruit diameter and weight.

Treatment
B ×Se0
Outcome
fruit diameter and weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The interactive effects of B ×S was significant on fruit diameter and weight, chlorophyll (Chl), carotenoid and potassium content, which were improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of bacteria and sulfur significantly improved chlorophyll, carotenoid and potassium content.

Treatment
B ×Se0
Outcome
chlorophyll (Chl), carotenoid and potassium contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The interactive effects of B ×S was significant on fruit diameter and weight, chlorophyll (Chl), carotenoid and potassium content, which were improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inoculated plants also showed high potassium content values.

Outcome
high values of potassium contente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“non-inoculated plants also showed high values of potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin and total carbohydrate improved with bacteria inoculation.

Treatment
bacteria inoculatione0
Outcome
Anthocyanin and total carbohydratee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin and total carbohydrate improved when bacteria inoculation was done; however, total acidity (TA) and total soluble solids (TSS) showed a significant decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total acidity and total soluble solids significantly decreased with bacteria inoculation.

Treatment
bacteria inoculatione0
Outcome
total acidity (TA) and total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin and total carbohydrate improved when bacteria inoculation was done; however, total acidity (TA) and total soluble solids (TSS) showed a significant decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The EL variable significantly decreased with inoculation or sulfur fertilization.

Treatment
inoculation or sulfur fertilizatione0
Outcome
EL variablee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The EL variable significantly decreased and tissue water content increased in this experiment, when inoculation or sulfur fertilization was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue water content increased with inoculation or sulfur fertilization.

Treatment
inoculation or sulfur fertilizatione0
Outcome
tissue water contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The EL variable significantly decreased and tissue water content increased in this experiment, when inoculation or sulfur fertilization was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1554 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors stress using sulfur and Thiobacillus bacteria to increase pomegranate growth, yield and chilling tolerance.

Taxon
pomegranate treesPunica granatume0
Interactor
Thiobacillus bacteriae0other
Outcome
increasing growth and yield and also chilling tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emphasized on the necessity of using sulfur and Thiobacillus bacteria in increasing growth and yield and also chilling tolerance of pomegranate trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1745 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.