Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Enhancement of Wheat Productivity and Zinc Accumulation Through Integrated Use of Zinc and Beneficial Microbes Under Irrigated and Rainfed Conditions

Murad Ali; Muhammad Sharif; Iftikhar Ahmed

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) is an imperative micro-nutrient for plant growth and development. Zinc is deficient all over the world, particularly in the developing countries and Zn sulfate is supplied as a source of Zn fertilizer. However, maximum part of the applied Zn sulfate become fixed in the soil and unavailable to plant. Plant growth promoting bacteria improving the crop growth and yield on sustainable basis. Inoculation of bacterial strains used is an effective technology, but limited research is available under field conditions. Therefore, field experiment was conducted under irrigated and rainfed conditions to evaluate the inoculation effect of indigenous beneficial microbes (BM) on wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation. Different treatment combinations (0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 kg Zn ha−1 without and with BM) were used on two wheat varieties (Wadaan-17 and Zincol-16). Results revealed that inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw. In irrigated conditions, yield increased by 33%, Zn accumulation in grain by 141% and in straw by 98.2%, but in rainfed conditions, yield increased by 38.9% Zn accumulation in grain by 130% and in straw by 123%. Compared to Zincol-16, Wadaan-17 performed better in terms of yield and Zn accumulation under both irrigated and rainfed conditions. The study concluded that inoculation of certain BM might reduce the rate at which chemical Zn fertilizer was used in both irrigated and rainfed conditions and could be employed as potential bio-inoculants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated yield rose 33%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
33%e1
Setting
irrigated conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“In irrigated conditions, yield increased by 33%, Zn accumulation in grain by 141% and in straw by 98.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1120 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated grain zinc accumulation rose 141%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
Zn accumulation in graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
141%e1
Setting
irrigated conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“In irrigated conditions, yield increased by 33%, Zn accumulation in grain by 141% and in straw by 98.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1120 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated straw zinc accumulation rose 98.2%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
in strawe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
98.2%e1
Setting
irrigated conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“In irrigated conditions, yield increased by 33%, Zn accumulation in grain by 141% and in straw by 98.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1120 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed yield rose 38.9%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38.9%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“in rainfed conditions, yield increased by 38.9% Zn accumulation in grain by 130% and in straw by 123%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed grain zinc accumulation rose 130%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
Zn accumulation in graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
130%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“in rainfed conditions, yield increased by 38.9% Zn accumulation in grain by 130% and in straw by 123%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed straw zinc accumulation rose 123%.

Treatment
inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizere2
Interactor
BMe2symbiont
Outcome
in strawe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
123%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth, yield and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“in rainfed conditions, yield increased by 38.9% Zn accumulation in grain by 130% and in straw by 123%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1227 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculating BM with chemical Zn fertilizer significantly (P ≤ .05) boosted yield and Zn accumulation in grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wadaan-17 outperformed Zincol-16 in yield and zinc accumulation under irrigated and rainfed conditions.

Material
Wadaan-17e0
Outcome
yield and Zn accumulatione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Zincol-16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to Zincol-16, Wadaan-17 performed better in terms of yield and Zn accumulation under both irrigated and rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded bacterial inoculation might lower chemical zinc fertilizer rates.

Treatment
inoculation of certain BMe0
Outcome
reduce the rate at which chemical Zn fertilizer was usede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of certain BM might reduce the rate at which chemical Zn fertilizer was used in both irrigated and rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.