Paper · 2023 · Journal of Food Legumes

Effect of foliar nutrition on growth and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) in red and lateritic soils of West Bengal

Dhananjoy Pratihar; Ramyajit Mondal; Subhajit Banerjee

17
claims
53
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of different foliar nutrition (Urea, DAP, NPK-19:19:19, NPK 10:26:26, ZnSO4 .7H2 O, Mo and Borax) along with recommended dose of chemical fertilizer (RDF) were evaluated with one control (RDF only) on summer season mungbean cv. Samrat during 2022 at Instructional Farm under Seacom Skills University, Birbhum, West Bengal. The experiment was laid down in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with eight treatment combinations replicated thrice. The results showed that tallest plants (58.5 cm) with more number of leaves (23.9) were observed in RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) treated plots. The same treatment showed the highest number of branches per plant (17.5) with maximum DMA (284.6 g m-2) but in case of underground portion like root length recorded highest in DAP foliar spray plot. Earliest 50% flowering, early pod emergence and early picking was recorded where combined application of RDF + borax at 0.2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS). The treatment RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha); followed by RDF + NPK (19-19-19) at 1% and RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS). Yield increase was to the tune of 3.54% to 10.74%. The gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were maximum when the crop received RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS). Hence, combined use of RDF + DAP at 2% and urea at 2% (sprayed 20 and 40 DAS) is beneficial for green gram production programme during summer season in the Red and Lateritic soils of West Bengal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% urea gave the tallest plants, 58.5 cm.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + Urea at 2%e0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
58.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tallest plants (58.5 cm) with more number of leaves (23.9) were observed in RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% urea gave more leaves, 23.9.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + Urea at 2%e0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
moree0
Value
23.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tallest plants (58.5 cm) with more number of leaves (23.9) were observed in RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% urea gave the highest branch count, 17.5.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + Urea at 2%e2
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment showed the highest number of branches per plant (17.5) with maximum DMA (284.6 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“tallest plants (58.5 cm) with more number of leaves (23.9) were observed in RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% urea gave maximum DMA, 284.6 g m-2.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + Urea at 2%e2
Outcome
DMAe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
284.6 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment showed the highest number of branches per plant (17.5) with maximum DMA (284.6 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“tallest plants (58.5 cm) with more number of leaves (23.9) were observed in RDF + Urea at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DAP foliar spray produced the highest root length.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
DAP foliar spraye0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length recorded highest in DAP foliar spray plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 0.2% borax gave earliest 50% flowering.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + borax at 0.2%e0
Outcome
50% floweringe0
Direction
Earlieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earliest 50% flowering, early pod emergence and early picking was recorded where combined application of RDF + borax at 0.2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 0.2% borax gave early pod emergence.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + borax at 0.2%e0
Outcome
pod emergencee0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earliest 50% flowering, early pod emergence and early picking was recorded where combined application of RDF + borax at 0.2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 0.2% borax gave early picking.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + borax at 0.2%e0
Outcome
pickinge0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earliest 50% flowering, early pod emergence and early picking was recorded where combined application of RDF + borax at 0.2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the most pods per plant, 18.8.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the highest pod length, 6.80 cm.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.80 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the highest seeds per pod, 10.75.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
number of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.75e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the highest seed index, 21.2 g.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.2 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the highest seed yield, 845 kg/ha.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
845 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP gave the highest stover yield, 2020 kg/ha.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2020 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS) augmented highest number of pods plant-1 (18.8), pod length (6.80 cm), number of seeds pod-1 (10.75), seed index (21.2 g), seed yield (845 kg/ha) and stover yield (2020 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased by 3.54% to 10.74%.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.54% to 10.74%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increase was to the tune of 3.54% to 10.74%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1369 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus 2% DAP maximized gross returns, net returns and benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Treatment
RDF + DAP at 2%e0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gross returns, net returns and benefit: cost ratio were maximum when the crop received RDF + DAP at 2% (sprayed twice at 20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1510 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF plus 2% DAP and 2% urea was recommended for summer green gram production in West Bengal.

Taxon
green gram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Material
Samrate1
Outcome
combined use of RDF + DAP at 2% and urea at 2%e0
Setting
West Bengale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined use of RDF + DAP at 2% and urea at 2% (sprayed 20 and 40 DAS) is beneficial for green gram production programme during summer season in the Red and Lateritic soils of West Bengal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“mungbean cv. Samrat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 · show in text ↑

borax · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.