Paper · 2023 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Alternative Growing Media for Producing Squash Transplants in North Sinai Region

Taghreed Badawi; Norhan M. Tayseer; Sally A. Ismail

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The objective of this study was to use alternative media for producing summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) transplants in the North Sinai Region. The experiment was conducted at the research farm in Faculty of Environmental Agricultural Sciences, Arish University, during the summers of 2021 and 2022. Different growing media for producing transplants of squash, cv. Escandrany, were used, including five substrate media: a control treatment of peat moss + vermiculite (commercial media), commercial media + biochar, commercial media + sawdust, commercial media + soil, and commercial media +chicken manure, all growing media were used at rate 1:1(v:v). The parameters that have been measured were; the germination percentage, and its rate, quality of transplants as (height of transplants, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments contents and N, P and K contents of the transplants leaves. Results showed that using commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochar led to increasing the germination percentage and improved transplants morphology characters (transplants height, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contents compared to commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manure, which had the lowest values. In addition, the economic study showed that the use of sawdust and biochar for production of squash transplants led to reduce the cost of transplants production by rate of 3.87% and 0.66%, respectively compared to control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial medium, sawdust medium and biochar medium increased squash germination compared with soil and chicken manure media.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochare0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“using commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochar led to increasing the germination percentage and improved transplants morphology characters (transplants height, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contents compared to commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those three media improved squash transplant height, leaf number and fresh weight.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochare0
Outcome
transplants height, number of leave, fresh weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“using commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochar led to increasing the germination percentage and improved transplants morphology characters (transplants height, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contents compared to commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those three media improved squash stem diameter, dry weight and vigor.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochare0
Outcome
stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigore0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“using commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochar led to increasing the germination percentage and improved transplants morphology characters (transplants height, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contents compared to commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those three media improved leaf pigment and N, P and K contents.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochare0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“using commercial media, commercial media + sawdust, and commercial media + biochar led to increasing the germination percentage and improved transplants morphology characters (transplants height, number of leave, fresh weight, stem diameter, dry weight and growth vigor), leaf photosynthetic pigments content and N, P and K contents compared to commercial media + soil and commercial media + chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust reduced transplant production cost by 3.87% versus control.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
sawduste0
Outcome
cost of transplants productione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
3.87%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“the use of sawdust and biochar for production of squash transplants led to reduce the cost of transplants production by rate of 3.87% and 0.66%, respectively compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar reduced transplant production cost by 0.66% versus control.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
cost of transplants productione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
0.66%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“the use of sawdust and biochar for production of squash transplants led to reduce the cost of transplants production by rate of 3.87% and 0.66%, respectively compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1639 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.