Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Growth and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis) as Influenced by Nano Urea during Pre and Post Pruning Opertation

Plabita Saikia; Aditi Smith Gogoi

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The growth and yield parameters of tea on mature plants of TV 23 clone were studied after application of Nano-urea as foliar spray at Experimental Garden for Plantation Crops, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat during the period 2021-22. Bud breaking number and time attain to tipping height were two growth parameters observed after pruning operation was carried out. Numbers of bud break was counted 30 days, 40 days and 50 days after pruning respectively. After 50 days maximum bud breaking number (106/ plant) was observed in 0.5% Nano-urea applied plot. To attain that height, lesser time was required (51 days) by the same plot. Plucking density, fine leaf count and green leaf yield were three yield parameters observed during first, second and rain flush. Plucking point density was found maximum (50 no/m2) during rain flush where 0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprays. Fine leaf count was found maximum during first flush than it decreasing during second flush and rain flush respectively. The green leaf yield was found high in the plot where 0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprays during rain flush.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 50 days from pruning, the maximum bud breaking number (106 per plant) was in the plot with 0.5% Nano-urea.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
0.5% Nano-ureae0
Outcome
bud breaking numbere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
106/ plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 50 days maximum bud breaking number (106/ plant) was observed in 0.5% Nano-urea applied plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5% Nano-urea plot required the least time (51 days) to attain tipping height.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
0.5% Nano-ureae1
Outcome
To attain that height, lesser time was requirede0
Direction
lessere0
Value
51 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“To attain that height, lesser time was required (51 days) by the same plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum bud breaking number (106/ plant) was observed in 0.5% Nano-urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plucking point density was maximum (50 per m2) during the rain flush with 0.4% Nano-urea in 3 sprays.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprayse0
Outcome
Plucking point densitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
50 no/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plucking point density was found maximum (50 no/m2) during rain flush where 0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine leaf count of tea was maximum during the first flush and decreased during the second flush and rain flush.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Outcome
Fine leaf counte0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
first flushe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fine leaf count was found maximum during first flush than it decreasing during second flush and rain flush respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green leaf yield was high in the plot with 0.4% Nano-urea in 3 sprays during the rain flush.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprayse0
Outcome
green leaf yielde0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“The green leaf yield was found high in the plot where 0.4% Nano-urea applied in 3 sprays during rain flush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1106 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.