Paper · 2023 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Acidity and nutrient management practices for enhancing soil nutrient availability, nutrient uptake and grain yield of rice in Vaikom kari soils in Kuttanad, Kerala

Devi VS; O Kumari Swadija; Radhika NS

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted during August to December 2015 and 2016 in farmers` fields in Thalayazham panchayat in Kottayam district. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design having 16 treatments in three replications with rice (Oryza sativa L.) var. Uma. The treatments were dolomite, lime + MgSO4 or RHA (rice husk ash) + MgSO4 along with 100% package of practice (POP) alone or with 100% POP + foliar spray of 13-0-45 N-P-K (KNO3) (1%) or borax (0.5%) or 13-0-45 + borax at PI (panicle initiation) stage. Lime + MgSO4 + 75% POP + 13-0-45 + borax as well as lime without MgSO4 + 100% POP combined with 13-0-45 or borax or both were also included as treatments. Higher grain yield of 5.42 and 5.57 t ha-1 during 2015 and 2016 respectively were produced by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 followed by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax and lime + POP + MgSO4 + 13-0-45. The treatments involving dolomite and lime with or without MgSO4 produced taller plants, higher tiller number m-2 and higher Leaf Area Index during both the years. Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 produced the highest number of panicles m-2. Higher test weight and lower percentage of unfilled grains were observed with dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 and dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax. Lime and dolomite treatments were more effective in reducing soil acidity and improving dehydrogenase activity and nutrient availability in the soil than RHA treatments during both the years. However, the effect of liming materials applied as basal and at 30 DAS diminishes after the crop and this necessitates application of liming materials in every crop season. Availability of soil N improved by treatments involving lime + POP without MgSO4 at PI and harvest stages. The treatments involving dolomite + POP and lime + POP with or without MgSO4 recorded higher available P during PI stage. In general, higher status of available K was registered by the treatments involving dolomite or lime application and lower K status registered by the treatment with 75% POP fertilizer. All treatments involving lime or dolomite registered higher soil available Ca and those involving dolomite or lime + MgSO4 showed higher availability of Mg in the soil. The treatments involving dolomite registered lower status of soil available Fe and higher status of available B. Higher status of available Zn was registered by the treatments involving dolomite or lime + MgSO4. Soil pH was significantly and positively correlated with available P, Ca and Mg and significantly and negatively correlated with available Fe in the soil. In general, higher uptake of macronutrients was observed with dolomite or lime + MgSO4 treatments along with 100% POP during both the years. Foliar spray of 13-0-45 recorded higher N and K uptake. Significant and positive correlation of grain yield with uptake of macro nutrients was also observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 gave higher 2015 rice grain yield of 5.42 t ha-1.

Treatment
dolomite + POP + 13-0-45e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
5.42e0
Qualifier
2015e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher grain yield of 5.42 and 5.57 t ha-1 during 2015 and 2016 respectively were produced by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 gave higher 2016 rice grain yield of 5.57 t ha-1.

Treatment
dolomite + POP + 13-0-45e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
5.57 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher grain yield of 5.42 and 5.57 t ha-1 during 2015 and 2016 respectively were produced by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax followed the leading yield treatment.

Treatment
dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + boraxe0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax and lime + POP + MgSO4 + 13-0-45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime + POP + MgSO4 + 13-0-45 was another following yield treatment.

Treatment
lime + POP + MgSO4 + 13-0-45e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax and lime + POP + MgSO4 + 13-0-45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite and lime treatments produced taller rice plants, more tillers, and higher leaf area index.

Treatment
dolomite and lime with or without MgSO4e0
Outcome
plants, higher tiller number m-2 and higher Leaf Area Indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatments involving dolomite and lime with or without MgSO4 produced taller plants, higher tiller number m-2 and higher Leaf Area Index during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 produced the most panicles per square metre.

Treatment
Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45e0
Outcome
number of panicles m-2e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 produced the highest number of panicles m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two dolomite + POP foliar treatments increased test weight.

Treatment
dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 and dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + boraxe0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher test weight and lower percentage of unfilled grains were observed with dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 and dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two dolomite + POP foliar treatments lowered unfilled grains.

Treatment
dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 and dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + boraxe0
Outcome
percentage of unfilled grainse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher test weight and lower percentage of unfilled grains were observed with dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 and dolomite + POP + 13-0-45 + borax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and dolomite reduced soil acidity more effectively than RHA.

Treatment
Lime and dolomite treatmentse0
Outcome
soil aciditye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
RHA treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lime and dolomite treatments were more effective in reducing soil acidity and improving dehydrogenase activity and nutrient availability in the soil than RHA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and dolomite improved soil dehydrogenase activity and nutrient availability more than RHA.

Treatment
Lime and dolomite treatmentse0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activity and nutrient availability in the soile0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
RHA treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lime and dolomite treatments were more effective in reducing soil acidity and improving dehydrogenase activity and nutrient availability in the soil than RHA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of basal and 30 DAS liming diminished after the crop.

Treatment
liming materials applied as basal and at 30 DASe0
Outcome
effect of liming materialse0
Direction
diminishese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effect of liming materials applied as basal and at 30 DAS diminishes after the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1546 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend liming every crop season.

Outcome
application of liming materials in every crop seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“this necessitates application of liming materials in every crop season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime + POP without MgSO4 improved available soil nitrogen.

Treatment
lime + POP without MgSO4e0
Outcome
Availability of soil Ne0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Availability of soil N improved by treatments involving lime + POP without MgSO4 at PI and harvest stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite + POP and lime + POP with or without MgSO4 raised available phosphorus at panicle initiation.

Treatment
dolomite + POP and lime + POP with or without MgSO4e0
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatments involving dolomite + POP and lime + POP with or without MgSO4 recorded higher available P during PI stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite or lime increased available soil potassium; 75% POP gave lower potassium.

Treatment
dolomite or lime applicatione0
Outcome
available Ke0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher status of available K was registered by the treatments involving dolomite or lime application and lower K status registered by the treatment with 75% POP fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–2035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime or dolomite raised soil calcium availability.

Treatment
lime or dolomitee0
Outcome
soil available Cae0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments involving lime or dolomite registered higher soil available Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite or lime + MgSO4 raised soil magnesium and zinc availability.

Treatment
dolomite or lime + MgSO4e0
Outcome
availability of Mg in the soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“those involving dolomite or lime + MgSO4 showed higher availability of Mg in the soil. The treatments involving dolomite registered lower status of soil available Fe and higher status of available B. Higher status of available Zn was registered by the treatments involving dolomite or lime + MgSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite lowered soil iron and raised boron.

Treatment
dolomitee0
Outcome
soil available Fee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatments involving dolomite registered lower status of soil available Fe and higher status of available B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2206–2317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH correlated positively with P, Ca, and Mg and negatively with Fe.

Outcome
available P, Ca and Mge0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil pH was significantly and positively correlated with available P, Ca and Mg and significantly and negatively correlated with available Fe in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2418–2571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite or lime + MgSO4 with full POP increased macronutrient uptake.

Treatment
dolomite or lime + MgSO4 treatments along with 100% POPe0
Outcome
uptake of macronutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher uptake of macronutrients was observed with dolomite or lime + MgSO4 treatments along with 100% POP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2585–2690 · show in text ↑

magnesium sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

magnesium sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

lime · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

136 papers: 123 positive, 13 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

132 papers more in this group

See all 136 papers →

lime · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

storage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.