Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Development and characterization of rice bran-gum Arabic based encapsulated biofertilizer for enhanced shelf life and controlled bacterial release

Rajinder Kaur; Sukhminderjit Kaur; Vagish Dwibedi; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Currently, microbe-based approaches are being tested to address nutrient deficiencies and enhance nutrient use efficiency in crops. However, these bioinoculants have been unsuccessful at the commercial level due to differences in field and in-vivo conditions. Thus, to enhance bacterial stability, microbial formulations are considered, which will provide an appropriate microenvironment and protection to the bacteria ensuring better rhizospheric-colonization. Methods The present study aimed to develop a phosphobacterium-based encapsulated biofertilizer using the ion-chelation method, wherein a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB), gum Arabic (GA), tricalcium phosphate, and alginate to develop low-cost and slow-release microbeads. The developed microbead was studied for encapsulation efficiency, shape, size, external morphology, shelf-life, soil release behavior, and biodegradability and characterized using SEM, FTIR, and XRD. Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied. Results The developed microbeads showed an encapsulation efficiency of 94.11%. The air-dried beads stored at 4°C were favorable for bacterial survival for upto 6 months. Microbeads showed 99.75% degradation within 110 days of incubation showing the bio-sustainable nature of the beads. The application of dried formulations to the pot-grown wheat seedlings resulted in a higher germination rate, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlings, and higher potassium and phosphorus uptake in wheat. Discussion This study, for the first time, provides evidence that compared to liquid biofertilizers, the RB-GA encapsulated bacteria have better potential of enhancing wheat growth and can be foreseen as a future fertilizer option for wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The encapsulated microbeads showed an encapsulation efficiency of 94.11%.

Outcome
encapsulation efficiencye1
Value
94.11%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“The developed microbeads showed an encapsulation efficiency of 94.11%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-dried beads stored at 4°C kept bacterial survival favourable for up to 6 months.

Outcome
bacterial survivale2
Value
6 monthse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e2

“The air-dried beads stored at 4°C were favorable for bacterial survival for upto 6 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbeads showed 99.75% degradation within 110 days of incubation.

Outcome
degradatione3
Value
99.75%e3
Qualifier
within 110 days of incubatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e3

“Microbeads showed 99.75% degradation within 110 days of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried formulations applied to pot-grown wheat seedlings increased germination rate.

Treatment
dried formulationse4
Interactor
Myroid gitamensise6symbiont
Outcome
germination ratee4
Direction
highere4
Setting
pot-growne4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of dried formulations to the pot-grown wheat seedlings resulted in a higher germination rate, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlings, and higher potassium and phosphorus uptake in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1602 · show in text ↑
e6

“a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried formulations applied to pot-grown wheat seedlings increased shoot and root length.

Treatment
dried formulationse4
Interactor
Myroid gitamensise6symbiont
Outcome
shoot length, root lengthe4
Direction
highere4
Setting
pot-growne4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of dried formulations to the pot-grown wheat seedlings resulted in a higher germination rate, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlings, and higher potassium and phosphorus uptake in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1602 · show in text ↑
e6

“a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried formulations applied to pot-grown wheat seedlings increased fresh and dry weight.

Treatment
dried formulationse4
Interactor
Myroid gitamensise6symbiont
Outcome
fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlingse4
Direction
highere4
Setting
pot-growne4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of dried formulations to the pot-grown wheat seedlings resulted in a higher germination rate, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlings, and higher potassium and phosphorus uptake in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1602 · show in text ↑
e6

“a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried formulations applied to wheat increased potassium and phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
dried formulationse4
Interactor
Myroid gitamensise6symbiont
Outcome
potassium and phosphorus uptakee4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, the wheat growth-promoting potential of microbeads was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1083 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of dried formulations to the pot-grown wheat seedlings resulted in a higher germination rate, shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight of the seedlings, and higher potassium and phosphorus uptake in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1602 · show in text ↑
e6

“a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulated bacteria have better potential of enhancing wheat growth than liquid biofertilizers.

Treatment
RB-GA encapsulated bacteriae5
Interactor
Myroid gitamensise6symbiont
Outcome
potential of enhancing wheat growthe5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
liquid biofertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“compared to liquid biofertilizers, the RB-GA encapsulated bacteria have better potential of enhancing wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1784 · show in text ↑
e6

“a bacterial strain, Myroid gitamensis was mixed with a composite solution containing rice bran (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–709 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.