Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Spraying Stages of Micro-Nano Elements on some Productive and Economical Traits of Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)

Amir M. H. Al-Shammari; Haider H. Blau; Ali H. Noaema

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the research is to study the effect of the stages of spraying nano-microelements on some yield characteristics and the economic feasibility of wheat varieties. Soil with a mixture of clay texture and using the split plank design using random complete sectors (R.C.B.D) The cultivars coded (Abu Ragheef V1, Baghdad V2, Babil V3, Aba 99 V4) occupied the main panels, while the spraying stages coded (tillering stage S1, booting stage S2, flowering stage S3) occupied the secondary panels. The results showed differences between the cultivars in some of the studied traits, as the father variety was significantly superior in the number of spikes and the number of grains per spike amounted to 410.7 spikes m 2 and 82.7 grains spike -1 , respectively, and the characteristic of the grain yield was 7.354 tons h -1 , the biological yield was 24.006 tons h -1 , and the total revenue 8,629,944 dinars h -1 , and a net profit of 6,430,044 dinars h -1 , while Abu Ragheef excelled in the weight of 1000 grains, amounting to 44.19 gm. As for the spraying stages, the Al-booting stage gave the highest average of the number of spikes, which amounted to 369.3 spikes m 2 , and the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1 . As for the overlap between the stages of spraying the micro-nano elements and the cultivars, the combination (Aba 99×S2) excelled in grain yield of 7.788 tons h -1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had 410.7 spikes per square meter, significantly above other cultivars.

Material
father varietye0
Outcome
number of spikese0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
410.7 spikes m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the father variety was significantly superior in the number of spikes and the number of grains per spike amounted to 410.7 spikes m 2 and 82.7 grains spike -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had 82.7 grains per spike, significantly above other cultivars.

Material
father varietye0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
82.7 grains spike -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the father variety was significantly superior in the number of spikes and the number of grains per spike amounted to 410.7 spikes m 2 and 82.7 grains spike -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had grain yield of 7.354 tons h -1.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
7.354 tons h -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the characteristic of the grain yield was 7.354 tons h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had biological yield of 24.006 tons h -1.

Outcome
biological yielde0
Value
24.006 tons h -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biological yield was 24.006 tons h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had total revenue of 8,629,944 dinars h -1.

Outcome
total revenuee0
Value
8,629,944 dinars h -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total revenue 8,629,944 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The father variety had net profit of 6,430,044 dinars h -1.

Outcome
net profite0
Value
6,430,044 dinars h -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a net profit of 6,430,044 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abu Ragheef excelled in 1000 grain weight at 44.19 gm.

Material
Abu Ragheefe0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
excellede0
Value
44.19 gme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abu Ragheef excelled in the weight of 1000 grains, amounting to 44.19 gm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at booting gave the highest spike number, 369.3 spikes m 2.

Treatment
Al-booting stagee0
Outcome
number of spikese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
369.3 spikes m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Al-booting stage gave the highest average of the number of spikes, which amounted to 369.3 spikes m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Booting-stage spraying excelled in grain yield at 7,406 tons h -1.

Treatment
Al-Booting stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
excellede0
Value
7,406 tons h -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Booting-stage spraying excelled in biological yield at 22,481 t h -1.

Treatment
Al-Booting stagee1
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
excellede1
Value
22,481 t h -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biological yield 22,481 t h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Booting-stage spraying excelled in total revenue at 8,448,561 dinars h -1.

Treatment
Al-Booting stagee1
Outcome
total revenuee0
Direction
excellede1
Value
8,448,561 dinars h -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aba 99 combined with S2 excelled in grain yield at 7.788 tons h -1.

Material
Aba 99e0
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
excellede0
Value
7.788 tons h -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination (Aba 99×S2) excelled in grain yield of 7.788 tons h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Al-Booting stage excelled in grain yield 7,406 tons h -1 , the biological yield 22,481 t h -1 , and the total revenue 8,448,561 dinars h -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1330 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.