Paper · 2004 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of Aluminum Toxicity on Wheat Plants Cultivated Under Conditions of Varying Ionic Strength

J. C. Pintro; G. J. Taylor

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of aluminum (Al) toxicity on growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66, were studied under varying conditions of solution electrical conductivity (EC). In solutions containing only 400 μM CaCl2 (low EC) with daily nutrient additions (0.20 g nutrient g plant−1 day−1), severe Al toxicity was observed at 20 μM Al. In more conventional nutrient solutions containing 3600 μM N and all other essential nutrients in optimal proportions (high EC), more than 200 μM Al was required to reduce plant mass production below 50% of control. Solution pH increased in both high and low EC solutions as a result of plant growth, but the effect was counteracted by Al toxicity. In low EC solutions (with daily nutrient additions), EC remained stable with time in the treatments without Al, reflecting a balance between the relative addition rate (RAR) of nutrients and the relative growth rate (RGR) of plants. In the presence of Al, solution EC increased as Al toxicity reduced the RGR of plants below the RAR. In high EC solutions, EC values decreased with time in all treatments as plant growth depleted fixed nutrient stocks. The extent of decline in EC was proportional to plant growth over the experimental period. The results of this study demonstrate that Al is more toxic when solution EC is maintained at low levels using the relative addition rate (RAR) technique. In contrast to high EC treatments, low EC treatments provided a growth response that was more consistent with those observed under field conditions. Use of the RAR technique and low EC conditions should be considered in future experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In low EC solutions with daily nutrient additions, severe Al toxicity was observed at 20 μM Al.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
Al toxicitye1
Value
20 μM Ale1
Qualifier
low ECe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In solutions containing only 400 μM CaCl2 (low EC) with daily nutrient additions (0.20 g nutrient g plant−1 day−1), severe Al toxicity was observed at 20 μM Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high EC solutions, more than 200 μM Al was required to reduce wheat plant mass production below 50% of control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
200 μM Ale1
Outcome
plant mass productione1
Direction
reducee1
Value
below 50%e1
Qualifier
high ECe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In more conventional nutrient solutions containing 3600 μM N and all other essential nutrients in optimal proportions (high EC), more than 200 μM Al was required to reduce plant mass production below 50% of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution pH increased in both high and low EC solutions as a result of plant growth, but the effect was counteracted by Al toxicity.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
Solution pHe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
as a result of plant growth, but the effect was counteracted by Al toxicitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Solution pH increased in both high and low EC solutions as a result of plant growth, but the effect was counteracted by Al toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–681 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In low EC solutions without Al, solution EC remained stable over time.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
ECe1
Direction
remained stablee1
Qualifier
in the treatments without Ale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“EC remained stable with time in the treatments without Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the presence of Al, solution EC increased because Al toxicity reduced the growth rate of plants below the nutrient addition rate.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
presence of Ale1
Outcome
solution ECe1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the presence of Al, solution EC increased as Al toxicity reduced the RGR of plants below the RAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high EC solutions, EC values decreased over time in all treatments as plant growth depleted fixed nutrient stocks.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
EC valuese1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
as plant growth depleted fixed nutrient stockse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In high EC solutions, EC values decreased with time in all treatments as plant growth depleted fixed nutrient stocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in EC was proportional to plant growth over the experimental period.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
plant growthe1
Outcome
extent of decline in ECe1
Direction
proportionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“growth of Triticum aestivum, cv. Atlas 66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The extent of decline in EC was proportional to plant growth over the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al is more toxic to wheat when solution EC is maintained at low levels using the relative addition rate technique.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
maintained at low levels using the relative addition rate (RAR) techniquee1
Outcome
toxice1
Direction
moree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of this study demonstrate that Al is more toxic when solution EC is maintained at low levels using the relative addition rate (RAR) technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low EC treatments gave a wheat growth response more consistent with field conditions than high EC treatments.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
low EC treatmentse1
Outcome
growth responsee1
Direction
more consistent with those observed under field conditionse1
Comparator
high EC treatmentse1
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“In contrast to high EC treatments, low EC treatments provided a growth response that was more consistent with those observed under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1528 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The RAR technique and low EC conditions should be considered in future wheat experiments.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Use of the RAR technique and low EC conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of the RAR technique and low EC conditions should be considered in future experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1619 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

aluminium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.