Abstract
The production and development of border cells vary with genotype, and they are released in wheat at an earlier stage of root development than other species studied so far. No significant difference was observed in the maximum number of border cells between Al-tolerant (Atlas 66) and Al-sensitive (Scout 66) cultivars in the absence of Al treatment. Al seriously inhibited the production and release of border cells, resulting in clumping of border cells in Scout 66, but less clustering in Atlas 66. The number of border cells released from roots treated with Al is significantly less than that from roots grown without Al treatment. Al treatment induced the death of detached border cells in vitro and they were killed by a 20-h treatment with 25 micro m Al. No significant difference in survival percentage of detached border cells was observed between Atlas 66 and Scout 66, regardless of the presence or absence of Al. The removal of border cells from root tips of both Atlas 66 and Scout 66 enhanced the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation concomitant with increased Al accumulation in the root. These results suggest that border cells adhered to the root tips play a potential role in the protection of root from Al injury in wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat releases border cells earlier in root development than other studied species.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- released in wheat at an earlier stage of root developmente0
- Comparator
- other species studied so fare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“they are released in wheat at an earlier stage of root development than other species studied so far”
Claim · model-written summary
Without Al, Atlas 66 and Scout 66 did not differ significantly in maximum border cell number.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Atlas 66e0
- Outcome
- maximum number of border cellse0
- Qualifier
- absence of Al treatmente0
- Comparator
- Scout 66e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“No significant difference was observed in the maximum number of border cells between Al-tolerant (Atlas 66) and Al-sensitive (Scout 66) cultivars in the absence of Al treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Al inhibited border cell production and release in Scout 66.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Scout 66e0
- Treatment
- Ale0
- Outcome
- production and release of border cellse0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Al seriously inhibited the production and release of border cells, resulting in clumping of border cells in Scout 66, but less clustering in Atlas 66”
Claim · model-written summary
Al caused more border cell clustering in Scout 66 than Atlas 66.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Scout 66e0
- Treatment
- Ale0
- Outcome
- clumping of border cellse0
- Direction
- less clusteringe0
- Comparator
- Atlas 66e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Al seriously inhibited the production and release of border cells, resulting in clumping of border cells in Scout 66, but less clustering in Atlas 66”
Claim · model-written summary
Al treated roots released significantly fewer border cells than untreated roots.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Ale0
- Outcome
- number of border cells releasede0
- Direction
- significantly lesse0
- Comparator
- without Al treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“The number of border cells released from roots treated with Al is significantly less than that from roots grown without Al treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
A 20-hour 25 micro m Al treatment killed detached border cells.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 20-h treatment with 25 micro m Ale0
- Outcome
- death of detached border cellse0
- Direction
- killede0
- Setting
- in vitroe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Al treatment induced the death of detached border cells in vitro and they were killed by a 20-h treatment with 25 micro m Al”
Claim · model-written summary
Detached border cell survival did not differ significantly between Atlas 66 and Scout 66 with or without Al.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Atlas 66e0
- Outcome
- survival percentage of detached border cellse0
- Qualifier
- regardless of the presence or absence of Ale0
- Comparator
- Scout 66e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“No significant difference in survival percentage of detached border cells was observed between Atlas 66 and Scout 66, regardless of the presence or absence of Al”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing border cells enhanced Al-induced root elongation inhibition in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- removal of border cellse0
- Outcome
- Al-induced inhibition of root elongatione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Qualifier
- both Atlas 66 and Scout 66e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“The removal of border cells from root tips of both Atlas 66 and Scout 66 enhanced the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation concomitant with increased Al accumulation in the root”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing border cells increased Al accumulation in roots of both cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- removal of border cellse0
- Outcome
- Al accumulation in the roote0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both Atlas 66 and Scout 66e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“The removal of border cells from root tips of both Atlas 66 and Scout 66 enhanced the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation concomitant with increased Al accumulation in the root”
The same questions in other papers
aluminium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.