Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

The Synergistic Effects of Environmental and Genetic Factors on the Regulation of Anthocyanin Accumulation in Plant Tissues

Van Giap Do; Youngsuk Lee; Jeong-Hee Kim; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Anthocyanin accumulation is responsible for the coloration of apple fruit, and their accumulation depends on the expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes. Light is an environmental stimulus that induces fruit color by regulating genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway. In this study, the roles of light and genetic factors on fruit coloration and anthocyanin accumulation in apple fruit were investigated. Three genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1, were synthesized and cloned into a viral-based expression vector system for transient expression in ‘Ruby S’ apple fruits. Apple fruits were agroinfiltrated with expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1. Agroinfiltrated apple fruits were then either kept in the dark (bagged fruits) or exposed to light (exposed fruits). The agroinfiltrated fruits showed significantly different coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation compared to the control fruits. Moreover, these parameters were higher in exposed fruits than in bagged fruits. For stable expression, MdCHS was introduced into a binary vector under the control of the rice α-amylase 3D (RAmy3D) promoter. The ectopic overexpression of MdCHS in transgenic rice calli showed a high accumulation of anthocyanin content. Taken together, our findings suggest that light, together with the overexpression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes, induced the coloration and accumulation of anthocyanin content in apple fruits by upregulating the expression of the genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroinfiltrated apple fruit had significantly altered coloration relative to controls.

Material
‘Ruby S’e2
Treatment
expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1e1
Outcome
coloration patternse0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agroinfiltrated fruits showed significantly different coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation compared to the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple fruits were agroinfiltrated with expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 637–730 · show in text ↑
e2

“in ‘Ruby S’ apple fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroinfiltrated apple fruit had significantly altered transcript expression relative to controls.

Treatment
expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1e1
Outcome
transcript expression levelse0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agroinfiltrated fruits showed significantly different coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation compared to the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple fruits were agroinfiltrated with expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 637–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroinfiltrated apple fruit had significantly altered anthocyanin accumulation relative to controls.

Treatment
expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1e1
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The agroinfiltrated fruits showed significantly different coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation compared to the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple fruits were agroinfiltrated with expression vectors harboring MdCHS, MdANS, and MdUFGT1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 637–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-exposed agroinfiltrated apple fruit showed higher coloration than bagged fruit.

Treatment
exposed to lighte2
Outcome
coloration patternse1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bagged fruitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters were higher in exposed fruits than in bagged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple fruits were then either kept in the dark (bagged fruits) or exposed to light (exposed fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-exposed agroinfiltrated apple fruit showed higher transcript expression than bagged fruit.

Treatment
exposed to lighte2
Outcome
transcript expression levelse1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bagged fruitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters were higher in exposed fruits than in bagged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple fruits were then either kept in the dark (bagged fruits) or exposed to light (exposed fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-exposed agroinfiltrated apple fruit accumulated more anthocyanin than bagged fruit.

Treatment
exposed to lighte2
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bagged fruitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters were higher in exposed fruits than in bagged fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“coloration patterns, transcript expression levels, and anthocyanin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple fruits were then either kept in the dark (bagged fruits) or exposed to light (exposed fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectopic MdCHS overexpression in transgenic rice calli produced high anthocyanin content.

Organ / stage
callie0
Treatment
ectopic overexpression of MdCHSe0
Gene
MdCHSe0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
high accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ectopic overexpression of MdCHS in transgenic rice calli showed a high accumulation of anthocyanin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1336 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute apple coloration and anthocyanin accumulation under light and gene overexpression to increased biosynthesis gene expression.

Treatment
light, together with the overexpression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genese0
Outcome
coloration and accumulation of anthocyanin contente0
Qualifier
upregulating the expression of the genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathwaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light, together with the overexpression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes, induced the coloration and accumulation of anthocyanin content in apple fruits by upregulating the expression of the genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1626 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: expression · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.