Paper · 2023 · Ibn AL- Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Science

Role of Ascorbic Acid in Drought Stress Tolerance of Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.

Amel Ghanim Muhmood AL-Kazzaz

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress, severely affecting the physiological processes and growth of plants. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the impacts of drought stress with three periods for irrigation: every 3 days(control), every 6 days, and every 12 days and foliar spray with different concentrations of ascorbic acid (0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1 on the wheat plant. Pots experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with three replications in the green house, Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Science (Ibn Al- Haitham), University of Baghdad, during the growing season, 2018 – 2019. The results indicated that drought stress decreased plant growth and hastened the senescence of flag leaves, which is significantly associated with a decrease in the quality and quantity of grain yield. Foliar spray with ascorbic acid enhanced plant drought tolerance in terms of plant height, shoot dry weight, flag leaf traits (flag leaf area, flag leaf chlorophyll and the concentration of macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium) and some yield components (spike length, grain weight. pot-1 and protein percentage of grains). The results indicated the efficiency of ascorbic acid foliar spray on vegetative growth, flag leaf traits and some yield components of wheat plants affected by drought stress and the superiority to 150 mg.L-1 ascorbic acid in which plants can resist the unfavorable drought stress periods(12 days).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased wheat growth.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
every 3 days(control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that drought stress decreased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“every 3 days(control), every 6 days, and every 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress hastened flag leaf senescence.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
senescence of flag leavese0
Direction
hastenede0
Comparator
every 3 days(control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress decreased plant growth and hastened the senescence of flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“every 3 days(control), every 6 days, and every 12 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf senescence was significantly associated with lower grain yield quality and quantity.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Outcome
quality and quantity of grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hastened the senescence of flag leaves, which is significantly associated with a decrease in the quality and quantity of grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid spray improved wheat height and shoot dry weight under drought.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray with ascorbic acide0
Outcome
plant height, shoot dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with ascorbic acid enhanced plant drought tolerance in terms of plant height, shoot dry weight, flag leaf traits (flag leaf area, flag leaf chlorophyll and the concentration of macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium) and some yield components (spike length, grain weight. pot-1 and protein percentage of grains).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid spray improved flag leaf area, chlorophyll and macronutrient concentration under drought.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray with ascorbic acide0
Outcome
flag leaf area, flag leaf chlorophyll and the concentration of macronutrientse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with ascorbic acid enhanced plant drought tolerance in terms of plant height, shoot dry weight, flag leaf traits (flag leaf area, flag leaf chlorophyll and the concentration of macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium) and some yield components (spike length, grain weight. pot-1 and protein percentage of grains).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid spray improved spike length, grain weight and grain protein percentage under drought.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray with ascorbic acide0
Outcome
spike length, grain weight. pot-1 and protein percentage of grainse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with ascorbic acid enhanced plant drought tolerance in terms of plant height, shoot dry weight, flag leaf traits (flag leaf area, flag leaf chlorophyll and the concentration of macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium) and some yield components (spike length, grain weight. pot-1 and protein percentage of grains).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“0, 75, 150, 225) mg.L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 mg.L-1 dose was superior for drought resistance at 12-day irrigation intervals.

Taxon
Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 mg.L-1 ascorbic acide0
Outcome
superioritye0
Direction
superioritye0
Qualifier
12 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the superiority to 150 mg.L-1 ascorbic acid in which plants can resist the unfavorable drought stress periods(12 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plant Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑

ascorbic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

ascorbic acid · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ascorbic acid · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.