Paper · 1999 · Madras Agricultural Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PYTHIUM APHANIDERMATUM, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA DISEASE COMPLEX IN CHILLI WITH ORGANIC AMENDMENTS

KARTHIKEYAN G; SABITHA DURAISAMY; SIVAKUMAR C.V

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum (Edson) Fitz. Meloidogyne incognita (Chitwood. 1949) disease complex in chilli with organic amendments viz., Farm yard manure and neem cake were field evaluated. The antagonistic organisms used were Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum (antagonists against Pythium aphanidermatum) and Paecilomyces lilacinus (antagonist against Meloidogyne incognita). The incidence of damping-off of chilli was significantly reduced in all the treatments, when the seeds were treated with antagonistic organisms and the soil was amended with the organic amendments 15 days before sowing viz., Farm yard manure or neem cake at the rate of 20 t/ha. The dry shoot and root weights were increased in T. viride + neem cake treatment followed by T. viride + farm yard manure treatment and the root-knot index was verymuch reduced in P.lilacinus + neem cake treatment followed by T. viride + farm yard manure treatment and the root-knot index was very much reduced in P.lilacinus + neem cake treatment and in P. lilacinus + Farm yard manure treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist seed treatments with manure or neem cake significantly reduced chilli damping-off incidence.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
seeds were treated with antagonistic organisms and the soil was amended with the organic amendments 15 days before sowinge0
Outcome
incidence of damping-off of chillie0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of damping-off of chilli was significantly reduced in all the treatments, when the seeds were treated with antagonistic organisms and the soil was amended with the organic amendments 15 days before sowing viz., Farm yard manure or neem cake at the rate of 20 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride plus neem cake increased dry shoot and root weights.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
T. viride + neem cake treatmente0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry shoot and root weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry shoot and root weights were increased in T. viride + neem cake treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride plus farm yard manure ranked next for dry shoot and root weights.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
T. viride + farm yard manure treatmente0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry shoot and root weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry shoot and root weights were increased in T. viride + neem cake treatment followed by T. viride + farm yard manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.lilacinus plus neem cake greatly reduced the root-knot index.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
P.lilacinus + neem cake treatmente0
Interactor
P.lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the root-knot index was verymuch reduced in P.lilacinus + neem cake treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinus plus Farm yard manure reduced the root-knot index.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
P. lilacinus + Farm yard manure treatmente0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHILLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the root-knot index was very much reduced in P.lilacinus + neem cake treatment and in P. lilacinus + Farm yard manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1068 · show in text ↑

Purpureocillium lilacinum · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

organic · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.