Paper · 2003 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Organic Pepper Production Systems Using Compost and Cover Crops

K. Delate; H. Friedrich; V. Lawson

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a national survey and through statewide focus groups, organic farmers identified pest management and soil fertility as their most critical vegetable research needs. In response, a long- term experiment was established to compare pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) growth, productivity, insect populations, harvest cullage and postharvest weight loss under conventional and organic management. Treatments from the first 3 years (1998 to 2000) consisted of combinations of two synthetic fertilizer and three compost-based certified organic soil amendments. In addition to the compost treatments, effects of a cover crop of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and rye (Secale cereale L.) were evaluated in the organic system from 1999 onward. Pepper growth, harvest weight and marketable fruit numbers were similar in conventional and organic production systems from 1998 to 2000 when 112 kg ha−1 N was applied through synthetic fertilizer or compost. Zone-tillage or incorporation of cover crops prior to planting resulted in pepper weights equivalent to compost treatments in 1999, but in zone-tilled plots in 2000, pepper growth was significantly reduced. Corn borer [Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner)] larval populations were similar in both systems, with beneficial insect populations greater in the organic system in 1999 only. The number of culled peppers due to insect or disease damage was similar in conventional and organic systems in 1998 and 1999, but greater in the synthetic fertilizer plots in 2000. Postharvest weight loss was similar in the compost (112 kg ha−1 N) and synthetic fertilizer treatments in 1999 and 2000 after three to nine weeks in 10°C storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper growth, harvest weight, and marketable fruit numbers were similar in conventional and organic systems with 112 kg ha−1 N during 1998 to 2000.

Taxon
Peppere0
Treatment
organic production systemse0
Outcome
Pepper growth, harvest weight and marketable fruit numberse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
conventionale0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“Pepper growth, harvest weight and marketable fruit numbers were similar in conventional and organic production systems from 1998 to 2000 when 112 kg ha−1 N was applied through synthetic fertilizer or compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop zone tillage or incorporation produced pepper weights equivalent to compost treatments in 1999.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
Zone-tillage or incorporation of cover cropse0
Outcome
pepper weightse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
compost treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Zone-tillage or incorporation of cover crops prior to planting resulted in pepper weights equivalent to compost treatments in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper growth was significantly reduced in zone-tilled plots in 2000.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
zone-tilled plotse0
Outcome
pepper growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in zone-tilled plots in 2000, pepper growth was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn borer larval populations were similar in both production systems.

Treatment
both systemse0
Interactor
Corn borere0pest
Outcome
Corn borer [Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner)] larval populationse0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Corn borer [Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner)] larval populations were similar in both systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beneficial insect populations were greater in the organic system in 1999 only.

Treatment
organic systeme0
Interactor
beneficial insecte0other
Outcome
beneficial insect populationse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“beneficial insect populations greater in the organic system in 1999 only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culled pepper numbers due to insect or disease damage were similar between systems in 1998 and 1999.

Taxon
peppersCapsicume0
Treatment
organic systemse0
Outcome
number of culled peppers due to insect or disease damagee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of culled peppers due to insect or disease damage was similar in conventional and organic systems in 1998 and 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culled pepper numbers were greater in synthetic fertilizer plots in 2000.

Taxon
peppersCapsicume1
Treatment
synthetic fertilizer plotse0
Outcome
number of culled peppers due to insect or disease damagee1
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater in the synthetic fertilizer plots in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1507 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of culled peppers due to insect or disease damage was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest pepper weight loss was similar after three to nine weeks of storage under compost and synthetic fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
compost (112 kg ha−1 N)e0
Outcome
Postharvest weight losse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
synthetic fertilizer treatmentse0
Setting
10°C storagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest weight loss was similar in the compost (112 kg ha−1 N) and synthetic fertilizer treatments in 1999 and 2000 after three to nine weeks in 10°C storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1670 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

cultivation system · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.