Paper · 2004 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Management of Root-Knot Nematode,Meloidogyne Incognita,by integration ofPaecilomyces Lilacinuswith organic materials in Chilli

Syed Faheem Ahmad; Tabreiz Ahmad Khan

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Studies were made to determine the efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus in management of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in soil amended with various organic matters. The soil amendments with organic additives except gram and rice husks significantly reduced the multiplication of M. incognita and the root galling caused by root-knot nematode which consequently increased the plant growth. The greatest improvement in plant growth and reduced reproduction factor and root galling was recorded in soil amendment with leaves of Calotropis procera while the least was in kail saw dust. The best protection against M. incognita was observed on the integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus, which resulted increased plant growth and reduced population build-up of nematodes and root gallings. The leaves of C. procera with P. lilacinus were most effective than all other organic materials used among the different integrated approaches. The organic amendments also increased the parasitism of P. lilacinus on M. incognita. Keywords: ManagementChilliMeloidogyne incognitaPaecilomyces lilacinus; Organic materials

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments with organic additives, except gram and rice husks, significantly reduced the multiplication of M. incognita and the root galling it caused in chilli.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
soil amendments with organic additives except gram and rice huskse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
multiplication of M. incognita and the root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil amendments with organic additives except gram and rice husks significantly reduced the multiplication of M. incognita and the root galling caused by root-knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments with organic additives (except gram and rice husks) increased chilli plant growth, consequent on the reduced nematode multiplication and galling.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
soil amendments with organic additives except gram and rice huskse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil amendments with organic additives except gram and rice husks significantly reduced the multiplication of M. incognita and the root galling caused by root-knot nematode which consequently increased the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest improvement in plant growth and the greatest reductions in reproduction factor and root galling occurred with soil amendment with Calotropis procera leaves.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
soil amendment with leaves of Calotropis procerae0
Outcome
improvement in plant growth and reduced reproduction factor and root gallinge0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The greatest improvement in plant growth and reduced reproduction factor and root galling was recorded in soil amendment with leaves of Calotropis procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least improvement in plant growth, reproduction factor and root galling occurred with kail saw dust amendment.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
kail saw duste0
Outcome
improvement in plant growth and reduced reproduction factor and root gallinge0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The greatest improvement in plant growth and reduced reproduction factor and root galling was recorded in soil amendment with leaves of Calotropis procera while the least was in kail saw dust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best protection against M. incognita was observed with the integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
integration of organic additives with P. lilacinuse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protection against M. incognitae0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best protection against M. incognita was observed on the integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–713 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus increased plant growth.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
integration of organic additives with P. lilacinuse0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus, which resulted increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus reduced the population build-up of nematodes and root gallings.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
integration of organic additives with P. lilacinuse0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population build-up of nematodes and root gallingse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“integration of organic additives with P. lilacinus, which resulted increased plant growth and reduced population build-up of nematodes and root gallings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the integrated approaches, C. procera leaves with P. lilacinus were most effective compared with all other organic materials.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
leaves of C. procera with P. lilacinuse0
Interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
all other organic materialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · InteractorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The leaves of C. procera with P. lilacinus were most effective than all other organic materials used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The organic amendments also increased the parasitism of P. lilacinus on M. incognita.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism of P. lilacinus on M. incognitae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic amendments also increased the parasitism of P. lilacinus on M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1045 · show in text ↑

Purpureocillium lilacinum · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.