Paper · 2023 · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response of Manfalouty and Hejazy pomegranate cultivars to conventional and Nano Zinc oxide foliar application

A.M.M. Abdelghany

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Recently, there has been interest in substituting ordinary mineral equivalents with nanoparticles (NPs), notably those derived from micronutrients. This experiment was carried out during two progressive seasons of 2021 and 2022 on 45 years-old Manfalouty and Hejazy pomegranate cultivars grown in the research orchard and laboratories of Pomology department, faculty of agriculture, Assiut university, Egypt. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Nano & conventional Zinc oxide and their comparative efficacy on fruit quality and marketable yield. Zinc Oxide conventional and nanoparticle (ZnO NPs) with two concentrations of each other (15 and 25 ppm), two sources of Zinc Oxide were sprayed twice (first: at full bloom and the second after a month from the first one). Results showed that Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm significantly improved leaf area in pomegranate cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppme0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm significantly improved fruit, arils and rind weight in pomegranate cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppme0
Outcome
fruit, arils and rind weighte0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm significantly improved juice volume in pomegranate cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppme0
Outcome
juice volumee0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm significantly improved TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars in pomegranate cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppme0
Outcome
TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugarse0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm significantly improved total acidity percentage in fruit juice in pomegranate cultivars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppme0
Outcome
total acidity percentage in fruit juicee0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nano Zinc at 15 and 25 ppm led to a significant improvement in almost studied characters (leaf area, fruit, arils and rind weight, juice volume, TSS, TSS/ acid, reducing sugars and total acidity percentage in fruit juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1026 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.