Abstract
The aim of this work was to study how certain applied cropping systems (conventional systems differentiated by fertilization level or sowing season and subsistence farming) influence yield, quality, productivity elements, and morphological characters in a collection of Romanian and foreign wheat cultivars. The following indicators were evaluated: productive potential (yield), quality (test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, sedimentation index, and gluten index), as well as other elements that determine yield (number of ears/square meter, thousand kernel weight, number of grains/ear, and weight of grains/ear) and plant height. The results show that the cropping systems influenced all the elements studied except the thousand-kernel weight. The only characteristics influenced by higher nitrogen fertilization were test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, and gluten index. The superiority of a delayed conventional system was shown by the number of grains/wheat ear and the deformation index. Protein content was differentiated between the conventional and the subsistence system, but especially between the low-input and the conventional system. Nitrogen supply is the most important factor for determining wheat productivity and grain quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping systems influenced all measured traits except thousand-kernel weight.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- all the elements studiede0
- Qualifier
- except the thousand-kernel weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the cropping systems influenced all the elements studied except the thousand-kernel weight”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-kernel weight was not affected by cropping systems.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- thousand-kernel weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the cropping systems influenced all the elements studied except the thousand-kernel weight”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen fertilization influenced test weight, protein content and wet gluten content.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- higher nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- test weight, protein content, wet gluten contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The only characteristics influenced by higher nitrogen fertilization were test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, and gluten index”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen fertilization influenced deformation and gluten indexes.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- higher nitrogen fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- deformation index, and gluten indexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The only characteristics influenced by higher nitrogen fertilization were test weight, protein content, wet gluten content, deformation index, and gluten index”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed conventional cropping was superior for grains per wheat ear.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- delayed conventional systeme0
- Outcome
- number of grains/wheat eare0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The superiority of a delayed conventional system was shown by the number of grains/wheat ear and the deformation index”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed conventional cropping was superior for deformation index.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- delayed conventional systeme0
- Outcome
- deformation indexe0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The superiority of a delayed conventional system was shown by the number of grains/wheat ear and the deformation index”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content differed between conventional and subsistence systems.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventionale0
- Outcome
- Protein contente0
- Direction
- differentiatede0
- Comparator
- subsistence systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protein content was differentiated between the conventional and the subsistence system”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content differed especially between low-input and conventional systems.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- low-inpute0
- Outcome
- Protein contente1
- Direction
- differentiatede1
- Comparator
- conventional systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“especially between the low-input and the conventional system”
e1“Protein content was differentiated”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identify nitrogen supply as the chief factor for wheat productivity and quality.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen supplye0
- Outcome
- wheat productivity and grain qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen supply is the most important factor for determining wheat productivity and grain quality”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.