Abstract
Genotype (cultivar), soil and climatic conditions, the agrotechnology used, and the interaction of the factors mentioned play a key role in the yield and quality of wheat grain. Currently, the European Union recommends the balanced use of mineral fertilisers and plant protection products in agricultural production (integrated production) or the use of only natural production methods (organic production). The aim of the study was to compare the yield and grain quality of four spring common wheat cultivars Harenda, Kandela, Mandaryna, and Serenada, grown under three farming systems: organic (ORG), integrated (INT), and conventional (CONV). A three-year field experiment was conducted between 2019 and 2021 at the Osiny Experimental Station (Poland, 51°27' N; 22°2' E). The results showed that significantly the highest wheat grain yield (GY) was obtained at INT, while the lowest was obtained at ORG. The physicochemical and rheological characteristics of the grain were significantly influenced by the cultivar factor and, with the exception of 1000 grain weight (TGW) and ash content (AC), by the farming system. There were also numerous interactions between the cultivar and farming systems, which suggests different performances of cultivars and, in fact, that some cultivars are better or worse suited to different production systems. The exceptions were protein content (PC) and falling number (FN), which were significantly highest in grain with CONV and lowest in grain with ORG farming systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated farming produced the highest wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- INTe0
- Outcome
- wheat grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- ORGe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest wheat grain yield (GY) was obtained at INT, while the lowest was obtained at ORG”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic farming produced the lowest wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- ORGe0
- Outcome
- wheat grain yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- INTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest wheat grain yield (GY) was obtained at INT, while the lowest was obtained at ORG”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar significantly affected grain physicochemical and rheological traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- cultivare0
- Outcome
- physicochemical and rheological characteristics of the graine0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The physicochemical and rheological characteristics of the grain were significantly influenced by the cultivar factor”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Farming system significantly affected grain traits except thousand-grain weight and ash content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- farming systeme0
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weight (TGW) and ash content (AC)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the exception of 1000 grain weight (TGW) and ash content (AC), by the farming system”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar and farming system showed numerous interactions for grain traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- cultivare0
- Treatment
- farming systemse0
- Outcome
- interactionse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were also numerous interactions between the cultivar and farming systems”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional farming produced the highest grain protein content; organic produced the lowest.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CONVe0
- Outcome
- protein content (PC)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- ORGe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein content (PC) and falling number (FN), which were significantly highest in grain with CONV and lowest in grain with ORG farming systems”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional farming produced the highest falling number; organic produced the lowest.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CONVe0
- Outcome
- falling number (FN)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- ORGe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein content (PC) and falling number (FN), which were significantly highest in grain with CONV and lowest in grain with ORG farming systems”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.