Evaluate the Efficacy of Different Biopesticides with Imidacloprid against Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize under field conditions

Abstract

An experiment of Maize stem borer Chilo partellus using different Bio-pesticides in field condition was carried out during Kharif 2022-2023 at central Research field SHUATS Prayagraj, UP., India. The management of Maize stem borer was done using 8 different treatments and benefit cost ratios of all the treatments were calculated. Total two sprays were applied to protect the crop from Chilo partellus using randomized block design with three replications. The observations of Chilo partellus 24 hours before (Pre- treatment) and 3rd, 7th and 14th day after spraying (post-treatment) were recorded for computing the percent of larval population reduction. The data were subjected to statistical analysis after appropriate transformation for interpretation. The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:5.01.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:5.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Zea mays* · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

*Chilo partellus* · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) produced a maize yield of 40.49q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 40.49q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:4.53.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:4.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Beauveria bassiana* · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) produced a maize yield of 38.45q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 38.45q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:4.41.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:4.41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Bacillus thuringiensis* · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) produced a maize yield of 37.7q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 37.7q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:4.20.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Metarhizium anisopliae (T2)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Metarhizium anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:4.20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Metarhizium anisopliae* · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) produced a maize yield of 36.79q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Metarhizium anisopliae (T2)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Second interactor: Metarhizium anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 36.79q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV (T3) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:4.03.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: NPV (T3)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:4.03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV (T3) produced a maize yield of 35.98q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: NPV (T3)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 35.98q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE @ 5% (T5) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.97.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: NSKE @ 5% (T5)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:3.97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSKE @ 5% (T5) produced a maize yield of 34.6q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: NSKE @ 5% (T5)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 34.6q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) produced a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.85.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: cost benefit ratioe0
Value: 1:3.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) produced a maize yield of 33.57q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6)e0
Interactor: Chilo partellus swinhoeChilo partellust0pest
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 33.57q/hae0
Comparator: control (T0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“The treatment with recommended insecticide cost benefit ratio and yield is in Imidacloprid 200 SL (T7) (1:5.01) (40.49q/ha) followed by Beauveria bassiana (2 CFU×108 ml) (T1) (1:4.53) (38.45q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (108 CFU/ml) (T4) (1:4.41) (37.7q/ha), Metarhizium anisopliae (T2) (1:4.20) (36.79q/ha), NPV (T3) (1:4.03) (35.98q/ha), NSKE @ 5% (T5) (1:3.97) (34.6q/ha), Azadirachtin 0.03% (T6) (1:3.85) (33.57q/ha) Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the lowest monetary return, with a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.52.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: control (T0)e0
Outcome: monetary returne0
Value: 1:3.52e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the lowest yield at 28.4q/ha.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: control (T0)e0
Outcome: yielde0
Value: 28.4q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0
“Lest monetary return and yieldwas obtained with control (T0) (1:3.52) (28.4q/ha).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1260 · show in text ↑

t0
“Maize Spotted Stem Borer (Chilo partellus swinhoe) on maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–134 · show in text ↑

Metarhizium anisopliae · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

positive
Beauveria bassiana isolate BB-01 and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates PPRC-4, PPRC-19, PPRC-61 and EE-01 induced 90 to 100% mortality of second instar Chilo partellus larvae seven days after treatment.
Biological control of the spotted stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) with the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae · 2008
Same direction

See all 2 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Bacillus thuringiensis reduced stem borer infestation versus untreated control.
Biorational management of stem borer, Chilo partellus in maize · 2018 · compared with untreated control
Same directionCited by this paper
positive
Bacillus thuringiensis was effective against both stem borer and cob borer in maize
Management of Chilo partellus Swinhoe and Stenachroia elongella Hampson in midhills of Meghalaya · 2022
Same direction

See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Beauveria bassiana reduced stem borer infestation versus untreated control.
Biorational management of stem borer, Chilo partellus in maize · 2018 · compared with untreated control
Same directionCited by this paper
positive
Beauveria treatment reduced dead hearts to 2.2-11.1% versus 28.86% in untreated maize.
Colonization of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin strains in maize (Zea mays L.) and their efficacy against stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) · 2017 · compared with untreated control plants
Same direction
positive
Beauveria bassiana isolate BB-01 and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates PPRC-4, PPRC-19, PPRC-61 and EE-01 induced 90 to 100% mortality of second instar Chilo partellus larvae seven days after treatment.
Biological control of the spotted stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) with the entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae · 2008
Same direction

See all 4 papers →

azadirachtin · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Azadirachtin reduced stem borer infestation versus untreated control.
Biorational management of stem borer, Chilo partellus in maize · 2018 · compared with untreated control
Same directionCited by this paper
positive
Neem Azal-F at 1 ml 1−1 caused higher egg mortality than other treatments.
Ovipositional Deterrency and Ovicidal effect of certain Neem Formulations against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) · 2000 · compared with rest of the treatments
Same direction
positive
azadirachtin 10,000ppm reduced Chilo partellus larvae per maize plant to 4.44, compared with 7.24 in untreated controls.
Comparative Study of Synthetic Insecticides with Biopesticides against Spotted Stem Borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2024 · compared with untreated control
Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

imidacloprid · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G was effective against Chilo partellus on maize.
Field evaluation of insecticides for management of spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on maize · 2017
Same direction
positive
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha had 15.3% Chilo partellus infestation at 20 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize. · 2009 · compared with all the treatments
Same direction
positive
Imidacloprid seed treatment alone reduced maize stem-borer infestation to 9.66%.
Efficacy of insecticides and some biopesticides against maize stem borer, Chilo partellus swinhoe · 2012
Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Abstract

Claims 16

The same questions in other papers

Metarhizium anisopliae · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

Bacillus thuringiensis · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

Beauveria bassiana · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

azadirachtin · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

imidacloprid · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree