Paper · 2017 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Field evaluation of insecticides for management of spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on maize

Arunkumara Cg; M. Bheemanna; Shaila Hm

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Management of spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on maize by insecticides was conducted in the Agricultural research station, Hagari (Ballari) UAS, Raichur, Karnataka during Kharif 2016. The results revealed that, the insecticide viz., imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 G were found to be effective molecules against Chilo partellus. Next superior treatments in order of priority were chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G > imidacloprid 60 FS + flubendiamide 39.35 SC > fipronil 0.3 G > carbofuran 3 G > flubendiamide 39.35 SC > imdacloprid 60 FS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G was effective against Chilo partellus on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 Ge0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
effective moleculese0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 G were found to be effective molecules against Chilo partellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 G was effective against Chilo partellus on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 Ge0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
effective moleculese0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 G were found to be effective molecules against Chilo partellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 G was effective against Chilo partellus on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 Ge0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partelluse0pest
Outcome
effective moleculese0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 60 FS - chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - fipronil 0.3 G, imidacloprid 60 FS - carbofuran 3 G were found to be effective molecules against Chilo partellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining maize insecticide treatments were ranked in the stated order of superiority.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
Outcome
Next superior treatments in order of prioritye0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G > imidacloprid 60 FS + flubendiamide 39.35 SC > fipronil 0.3 G > carbofuran 3 G > flubendiamide 39.35 SC > imdacloprid 60 FSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Next superior treatments in order of priority were chlorantriniliprole 0.4 G > imidacloprid 60 FS + flubendiamide 39.35 SC > fipronil 0.3 G > carbofuran 3 G > flubendiamide 39.35 SC > imdacloprid 60 FS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–130 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fipronil · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imidacloprid · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.