Paper · 2023 · Akademik Ziraat Dergisi

Reduction of Lime-Based Iron Chlorosis in Apple Trees

Ayşegül KORKMAZ; Fatma GÖKMEN YILMAZ; Mustafa HARMANKAYA; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Objective: This study was conductud with the aim of determining the effects of different applications (Fe fertilizers, K-Humate, and sulfur) on shoot length, active and total Fe, chlorophyll a, b, and a+b, fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple. Materials and Methods: In the study, which was conducted in 4 replications according to trial pattern of chance blocks in an apple orchard with a lot of lime and alkaline reactions,13 applications (Control, FeSO4.7H2O (19% Fe), Elemental S, FeSO4.7H2O + Elemental S, K-Humate, FeSO4.7H2O + K-Humate, Fe-EDTA (%13 Fe), Fe-DTPA (%6 Fe), Fe-HBED (%6 Fe), Fe-EDDHA (o-o:2.2) (%6 Fe), Fe-EDDHA (o-o:3.5) (%6 Fe), Fe-EDDHA (o-o:4.8) (%6 Fe), and Fe-EDDHA (o-o:5.25) (%6 Fe)]. Results: As a result of the study, the effects of the applications on the investigated parameters were found to be statistically significant, and the maximum effect was determined by FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate and Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) applications. Since there is no difference between these applications, Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) or Fe-chelate fertilizers can be used instead of FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humat. Conclusion: In addition, it has been determined that iron intake by plants increased as ortho-ortho isomer ratios increase in Fe-chelate fertilizers. It has been determined that applying Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25), one of the Fe-chelate fertilizers, is more effective than other applications in reducing and eliminating chlorosis in calcareous soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate and Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) applications had the maximum effect on the investigated apple parameters among the 13 applications.

Treatment
FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate and Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) applicationse2
Outcome
investigated parameterse2
Direction
maximum effecte2
Comparator
Controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 applications (Control, FeSO4.7H2O (19% Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–494 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effects of the applications on the investigated parameters were found to be statistically significant, and the maximum effect was determined by FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate and Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The applications had statistically significant effects on the investigated apple parameters compared with the control.

Treatment
applicationse2
Outcome
investigated parameterse2
Comparator
Controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 applications (Control, FeSO4.7H2O (19% Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–494 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effects of the applications on the investigated parameters were found to be statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) is more effective than other applications in reducing and eliminating chlorosis in calcareous soils.

Treatment
Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25)e3
Outcome
chlorosise3
Direction
reducinge3
Comparator
other applicationse3
Setting
calcareous soilse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e3

“applying Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25), one of the Fe-chelate fertilizers, is more effective than other applications in reducing and eliminating chlorosis in calcareous soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1470 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron intake by apple plants increased as the ortho-ortho isomer ratio increased in Fe-chelate fertilizers.

Treatment
ortho-ortho isomer ratiose4
Outcome
iron intakee4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e4

“iron intake by plants increased as ortho-ortho isomer ratios increase in Fe-chelate fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1275 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) or Fe-chelate fertilizers in place of FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate for apple.

Outcome
Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) or Fe-chelate fertilizers can be used instead of FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e5

“Since there is no difference between these applications, Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) or Fe-chelate fertilizers can be used instead of FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) showed no difference from FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate in the measured apple parameters.

Treatment
Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25)e5
Outcome
difference between these applicationse5
Direction
no differencee5
Comparator
FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humate5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit Fe concentration, yield efficiency, and yield of apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–266 · show in text ↑
e5

“Since there is no difference between these applications, Fe-EDDHA (o-o: 5.25) or Fe-chelate fertilizers can be used instead of FeSO4.7H2O+K-Humat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1125 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.