Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Efficacy and Economics of Selected Insecticides against Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]

Gundlapalli Ranjith; Ashwani Kumar

16
claims
69
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022. Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera i.e. of Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC, Emamectin benzoate 5 SG, Flubendiamide 480 SC, Spinosad 45 SC, Thiamethoxam 25 WG, Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC, Indoxacarb 14.5 SC and untreated Control. Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323). Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (1.478) was found tobe the next best treatment followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1.589), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.734) and Flubendiamide 480 SC (1.922).The least effective treatments were Spinosad 45 SC (2.089) where as Thiamethoxam 25 WG (2.200) was found to be least effective. The plot treated with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC show highest yield (19.46 q/ha) followed Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89). Among the treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89) followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave the lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer, 1.323.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe2
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
loweste2
Value
1.323e2
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC was the next best treatment for cowpea pod borer larval population, 1.478.

Treatment
Lambda cyhalothrin5 ECe3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
next beste3
Value
1.478e3
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (1.478) was found tobe the next best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5 SG followed in larval population with 1.589 for cowpea pod borer.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5 SGe4
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
followed bye4
Value
1.589e4
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1.589), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.734) and Flubendiamide 480 SC (1.922)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5 SC followed in larval population with 1.734 for cowpea pod borer.

Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe4
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
followed bye4
Value
1.734e4
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1.589), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.734) and Flubendiamide 480 SC (1.922)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 480 SC followed in larval population with 1.922 for cowpea pod borer.

Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SCe4
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
followed bye4
Value
1.922e4
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1.589), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.734) and Flubendiamide 480 SC (1.922)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC was the least effective treatment against cowpea pod borer larvae, 2.089.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SCe5
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
least effectivee5
Value
2.089e5
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e5

“The least effective treatments were Spinosad 45 SC (2.089) where as Thiamethoxam 25 WG (2.200) was found to be least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25 WG was the least effective treatment against cowpea pod borer larvae, 2.200.

Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25 WGe5
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval population of cowpea pod borere2
Direction
least effectivee5
Value
2.200e5
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea pod borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1.323)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–485 · show in text ↑
e5

“The least effective treatments were Spinosad 45 SC (2.089) where as Thiamethoxam 25 WG (2.200) was found to be least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave the highest cowpea yield, 19.46 q/ha.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
19.46 q/hae6
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“The plot treated with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC show highest yield (19.46 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC followed the highest cowpea yield, 17.82 q/ha.

Treatment
Lambda cyhalothrin5 ECe7
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
followede7
Value
17.82 q/hae7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“The plot treated with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC show highest yield (19.46 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–871 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC was the best and most economical treatment for cowpea, ratio 1:3.89, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe6
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
best and most economicale6
Value
1: 3.89e6
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:3.67, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Lambda cyhalothrin 5 ECe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:3.67e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5 SG followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:3.41, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5 SGe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:3.41e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5 SC followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:2.95, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:2.95e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 480 SC followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:2.56, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SCe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:2.56e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:2.27, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SCe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:2.27e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25 WG followed the best economic ratio for cowpea, 1:2.17, against the untreated control.

Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25 WGe7
Outcome
economical treatmente6
Direction
followed bye7
Value
1:2.17e7
Comparator
untreated control plote7
Setting
CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field trail was conducted at CRF, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lambda cyhalothrin5 EC (17.82 q/ha) the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (1: 3.89)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–997 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (1:3.67), Emamectin benzoate 5 SG (1:3.41), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:2.95), Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:2.56), Spinosad 45 SC (1:2.27) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (1:2.17) as compared to untreated control plot (1:1.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1352 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.