Paper · 2023 · Progress in Plant Protection

Effect of basalt dust application with sulfur addition on soil pH and nutritional value of wheat and pea

Jolanta Korzeniowska; Ewa Stanisławska-Glubiak; Mariusz Kowalczyk; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The microplot experiment was carried out on two soils (clay and sandy) with spring wheat and fodder pea. In the experiment, the effect of a granular product made of basalt dust and elemental sulphur with a sulphur content of 1.5% was tested. Fertilization of wheat with sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha S and pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha S in the form of basalt-sulphur granulate resulted in a significant increase in the content of methionine, cystine and protein in wheat grain on sandy soil. However, no increase in the content of these amino acids and protein in pea seeds was observed. Moreover, an increase in the content of sulphur in wheat grain and straw as well as in pea straw was noted. The use of sulphur in combination with basalt dust did not lower the pH of any of the experimental soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basalt-sulphur fertilization significantly increased methionine, cystine and protein in wheat grain on sandy soil.

Treatment
sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha Se0
Outcome
content of methionine, cystine and protein in wheat graine0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
sandy soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization of wheat with sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha S and pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha S in the form of basalt-sulphur granulate resulted in a significant increase in the content of methionine, cystine and protein in wheat grain on sandy soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basalt-sulphur fertilization did not increase these amino acids or protein in pea seeds.

Treatment
pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha Se1
Outcome
content of these amino acids and protein in pea seedse0
Direction
no increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no increase in the content of these amino acids and protein in pea seeds was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–587 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization of wheat with sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha S and pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha S in the form of basalt-sulphur granulate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur content increased in wheat grain and straw.

Treatment
sulphure1
Outcome
content of sulphur in wheat grain and strawe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the content of sulphur in wheat grain and straw as well as in pea straw was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–695 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization of wheat with sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha S and pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha S in the form of basalt-sulphur granulate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur content increased in pea straw.

Organ / stage
pea strawe0
Treatment
sulphure1
Outcome
content of sulphure0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the content of sulphur in wheat grain and straw as well as in pea straw was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–695 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization of wheat with sulphur in the dose of 30 kg/ha S and pea in the dose of 20 kg/ha S in the form of basalt-sulphur granulate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur with basalt dust did not lower soil pH.

Treatment
sulphur in combination with basalt duste0
Outcome
pH of any of the experimental soilse0
Direction
did not lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of sulphur in combination with basalt dust did not lower the pH of any of the experimental soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.